Large-scale evaluation of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis in children with severe developmental disorders
Copeland, H.; Low, K. J.; Wynn, S.; Ahmed, A.; Arthur, V.; Balasubramanian, M.; Bennett, K.; Berg, J.; Bertoli, M.; Bryson, L.; Bucknall, C.; Campbell, J.; Chandler, K.; Chauhan, J.; Clarkson, A.; Coles, R.; Conti, H.; Costello, P.; Coupar, T.; Craig, A.; Dean, J.; Dillon, A.; Dixit, A.; Drew, K.; Eason, J.; Forzano, F.; Foulds, N.; Gardham, A.; Ghali, N.; Green, A.; Hanna, W.; Harrison, R.; Hegarty, M.; Higgs, J.; Holder, M.; Irving, R.; Jain, V.; Johnson, K.; Jolley, R.; Jones, W.; Jones, G.; Joss, S.; Kalinauskiene, R.; Kanini, F.; Kavanagh, K.; Khan, M.; Khan, N.; Kivuva, E.; Lahiri, N.; L
Show abstract
ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate outcomes for clinical management following a genetic diagnosis from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) Study. DesignIndividuals in the DDD study who had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic genotype in the DECIPHER database were selected for inclusion (n=5010). Clinical notes from regional clinical genetics services notes were reviewed to assess pre-defined clinical outcomes relating to interventions, prenatal choices, and information provision. ResultsOutcomes were recorded for 4237 diagnosed probands (85% of those eligible) from all 24 recruiting centres across the UK and Ireland. Additional diagnostic or screening tests were performed in 903 (21%) probands through referral to a range of different clinical specialties, and stopped or avoided in a further 26 (0.6%). Disease-specific treatment was started in 85 (2%) probands, including seizure-control medications and dietary supplements, and contra-indicated medications were stopped/avoided as no longer necessary in a further 20 (0.5%). The option of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing was discussed with 1204 (28%) families, despite the relatively advanced age of the parents at the time of diagnosis. Importantly, condition-specific information or literature was given to 3214 (76%) families, and 880 (21%) were involved in family support groups. In the most common condition (KBG syndrome; 79 (2%) probands), clinical interventions only partially reflected the temporal development of phenotypes, highlighting the importance of consensus management guidelines and patient support groups. ConclusionsOur results underscore the importance of achieving a clinico-molecular diagnosis to ensure timely onward referral of patients, enabling appropriate care and anticipatory surveillance, and for accessing relevant patient support groups.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic assessment of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis identified through a large-scale research study into developmental disorders 96%
- Genome sequencing reveals the impact of non-canonical exon inclusions in rare genetic disease 94%
- Estimating diagnostic noise in panel-based genomic analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebral Visual Impairment: genetic diagnoses and phenotypic associations 94%
- Clinical description, molecular delineation and genotype-phenotype correlation in 340 patients with KBG syndrome: Addition of 67 new patients 93%
- EyeG2P: an automated variant filtering approach improves efficiency of diagnostic genomic testing for inherited ophthalmic disorders 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Re-evaluation and Re-analysis of 152 research exomes five years after the initial report reveals clinically relevant changes in 20% 93%
- Polycomb-associated and Trithorax-associated developmental conditions – phenotypic convergence and heterogeneity 92%
- BCL11A intellectual developmental disorder: defining the clinical spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Next-generation phenotyping in Nigerian children with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome 92%
- Resolving the diagnostic odyssey in inherited retinal dystrophies through long-read genome sequencing 91%
- Ophthalmic Manifestations of NAA10-Related and NAA15-Related Neurodevelopmental Syndrome: Analysis of Cortical Visual Impairment and Refractive Errors 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.