Back

dismo: building and analysing discrete spatial ODE models

van Aalst, M.; Ebenhoeh, O.

2023-10-23 systems biology
10.1101/2023.10.17.562679 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Summarydismo is a Python package for building and analysing discrete spatial models based on ordinary differential equations. Its primary purpose is to allow arbitrarily complex internal and transport processes to easily be mapped over multiple different regular grids. For this it features one, two and threedimensional layouts, with standard and non-standard (e.g. hexagonal or triangular) grids. Availability and implementationhttps://gitlab.com/qtb-hhu/dismo Contactoliver.ebenhoeh@hhu.de

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
22.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.2%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Neuroinformatics
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
○ 41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
12
IFAC-PapersOnLine
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
13
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
○ 176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
The European Physical Journal E
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.9%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Systems Biology
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
Journal of Open Source Software
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
20
SoftwareX
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.