Toxoplasma gondii and Trypanosoma lewisi infection in urban small mammals from Cotonou, Benin, with special emphasis on co-infection patterns
ETOUGBETCHE, J. R.; HOUEMENOU, G.; Missihoun, A. A.; Gauthier, P.; Dossou, H.-J.; Galal, L.; Dalecky, A.; Diagne, C.; Dobigny, G.; MERCIER, A.
Show abstract
A growing number of studies has highlighted the importance of co-infections in eco-evolutionary processes underlying host-parasite interactions and the resulting epidemiology of zoonotic agents. Small mammals, and particularly rodents, are known to be important reservoirs of many zoonotic pathogens, such as Toxoplasma gondii and Trypanosoma lewisi that are responsible for toxoplasmosis and atypical trypanosomiasis in human, respectively. Laboratory experiments on rodent models have shown that primary infection with T. lewisi increases the host susceptibility to other co-infectious parasites, including T. gondii, following an alteration of the immune system. However, data on potential interactions between these parasites in wild small mammals remain scarce. In this study, we estimate the T. lewisi prevalence in 553 small mammals from four localities of Cotonou city, Benin. They were then combined with T. gondii data previously collected on the same individuals in order to investigate the influence of T. lewisi on T. gondii infection, and vice-versa, using cooccurrence tests and Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Despite quite high overall prevalence (32.5% and 15.2% for T. gondii and T. lewisi, respectively), we observed a clear and significant segregation between the two parasites. This may be explained by (i) differences in the species-specific susceptibility of small mammal host species to infection by these two parasites, with R. rattus and M. natalensis being the main reservoirs of T. lewisi while C. olivieri and M. m. domesticus are the main hosts for T. gondii; and/or by (ii) a possibly high mortality in co-infected animal in the wild. Although dedicated experimental studies are required to confirm this pattern, as they stand, our data fail to support that infection of small mammals by one of these two parasites favours widespread infection by the second one in nature.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feeding behavior and activity of Phlebotomus pedifer and potential reservoir hosts of Leishmania aethiopica in southwestern Ethiopia. 96%
- Invasive plants facilitated by socioeconomic change shelter vectors of scrub typhus and spotted fever 95%
- Molecular epidemiology of Animal African Trypanosomosis in southwest Burkina Faso 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Great-tailed Grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus) as a tolerant host of avian malaria parasites 96%
- First evaluation and detection of ivermectin resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep and goats in South Darfur, Sudan 95%
- Validation of a novel multiplex real-time PCR assay for Trypanosoma cruzi detection and quantification in acai pulp 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Triatoma dimidiata, domestic animals and acute Chagas disease: A 10 year follow-up after an eco-bio-social intervention 96%
- Molecular detection of Leishmania donovani, Leishmania major, and Trypanosoma spp. in Sergentomyia squamipleuris sandflies from a visceral leishmaniasis focus in Merti sub-County, eastern Kenya 96%
- Molecular detection of pathogens in ticks and fleas collected from companion dogs and cats in East and Southeast Asia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multidimensional analysis of the risk of infection with Ehrlichia canis among urban dogs in Iquitos, Peru. 95%
- Multiple invasions, Wolbachia and human-aided transport drive the genetic variability of Aedes albopictus in the Iberian Peninsula 94%
- Multiple incursion pathways for Helicoverpa armigera in Brazil show its genetic diversity spreading in a connected world 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.