Scaling the fitness effects of mutations with respect to differentially adapted Arabidopsis thaliana accessions under natural conditions
Stearns, F. W.; Zhou, J.; Fenster, C. B.
Show abstract
Mutations are the ultimate source of genetic variation for natural selection to act upon. A major question in evolutionary biology is the extent to which new mutations can generate genetic variation under natural conditions to permit adaptive evolution over ecological time scales. Here we collected fitness data for chemically induced (ethylmethane sulfonate, EMS) mutant lines descended from two Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes that show differential adaptation to the local environment of our common garden plot. Using a novel nonparametric Bayesian statistical approach, we found that both ecotypes accumulated substantial proportions of beneficial mutations. The poorly adapted ecotype showed higher variance in the fitness effect of mutations than the well-adapted ecotype. Furthermore, we predict that it takes less than 4000 generations for the fitness space of the two ecotypes to overlap through mutation accumulation, and that a single founder, through mutation accumulation, is able to achieve the species-wide genetic variation in less than 10,000 generations. Our results provide evidence for relatively rapid local adaptation of Arabidopsis thaliana in natural conditions through new mutations, as well as the utility of nonparametric Bayesian method for modeling the distribution of fitness effects for field-collected data.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The long-term effects of genomic selection: 2. Changes in allele frequencies of causal loci and new mutations 95%
- Robust Genomic Modelling of Additive and Non-Additive Variation with Intuitive Inclusion of Expert Knowledge 94%
- Interplay between extreme drift and selectionintensities favors the fixation of beneficial mutations in selfing maize populations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.