Back

Place of Birth and Cognition among Older Americans: Findings from the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol

Lin, Z.; Chen, X.

2023-10-15 neurology
10.1101/2023.10.12.23296954 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesGrowing evidence suggests that place of birth (PoB) and related circumstances may have long-lasting and multiplicative contributions to various later-life outcomes. However, the specific contributions to different domains of cognitive function in late life remain less understood. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which PoB contribute to a wide range of later-life cognitive outcomes. MethodsA nationally representative sample of Americans aged 65 and older (N=3,216) from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) was utilized. Cognitive outcomes were assessed in HCAP and linked to HRS state-level PoB data to explore the contribution of birthplace to later-life cognitive disparities. Regression-based Shapley decompositions were employed to quantify this contribution. ResultsPoB significantly contributed to all assessed cognitive outcomes including memory, executive function, language and fluency, visuospatial function, orientation, global cognitive performance, cognitive impairment and dementia. Geographic disparities in cognitive outcomes were evident, with individuals born in US southern states and foreign-born individuals performing worse than those born in other states. PoB overall accounted for 2.4-13.9% of the total variance in cognition after adjusting for age and sex. This contribution reduced by half when adjusting for a rich set of sociodemographic and health factors over the life course, but PoB still independently explained 2.0-7.1% of the total variance in cognition. DiscussionPoB has lasting contributions to later-life cognitive health, with significant geographic disparities observed. Addressing these disparities requires promoting more equalized place-based policies, resources, and early-life environments to improve health equities over the life course.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
5
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
15
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%