Back

In vitro development and optimization of cell-laden injectable bioprinted gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) microgels mineralized on the nanoscale

Sousa, M. G. C.; Balbinot, G. d. S.; Subbiah, R.; Visalakshan, R.; Tahayeri, A.; Verde, M. E. Q. L.; Athirasala, A.; Romanowicz, G.; Guldberg, R. E.; Bertassoni, L. E.

2023-10-12 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.10.10.560919 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bone defects may occur in different sizes and shapes due to trauma, infections, and cancer resection. Autografts are still considered the primary treatment choice for bone regeneration. However, they are hard to source and often create donor-site morbidity. Injectable microgels have attracted much attention in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine due to their ability to replace inert implants with a minimally invasive delivery. Here, we developed novel cell-laden bioprinted gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) injectable microgels, with controllable shapes and sizes that can be controllably mineralized on the nanoscale, while stimulating the response of cells embedded within the matrix. The injectable microgels were mineralized using a calcium and phosphate-rich medium that resulted in nanoscale crystalline hydroxyapatite deposition and increased stiffness within the crosslinked matrix of bioprinted GelMA microparticles. Next, we studied the effect of mineralization in osteocytes, a key bone homeostasis regulator. Viability stains showed that osteocytes were maintained at 98% viability after mineralization with elevated expression of sclerostin in mineralized compared to non-mineralized microgels, indicating that mineralization effectively enhances osteocyte maturation. Based on our findings, bioprinted mineralized GelMA microgels appear to be an efficient material to approximate the bone microarchitecture and composition with desirable control of sample injectability and polymerization. These bone-like bioprinted mineralized biomaterials are exciting platforms for potential minimally invasive translational methods in bone regenerative therapies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.8%
2
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
14
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
15
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
21
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%