A systematic review of non-clinician trauma-based interventions for school-age children and young people
Avery, F.; Kennedy, N.; James, M.; Jones, H.; Amos, R.; Bellis, M.; Hughes, K.; Brophy, S.
Show abstract
Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is increasingly recognised as a risk factor for health problems in later life. Awareness of ACEs and associated trauma is increasing in schools and educational settings, as well as demand for supportive services to deal with needs. However, there is a lack of clear evidence for effective interventions which can be delivered by non-clinicians (e.g., the school staff themselves). For this review, we conducted a search across five electronic databases for studies published since January 2013. These studies assessed the efficacy of non-clinician delivered interventions for supporting trauma recovery or improvements in mental health in school age youth (4-18 years) who have experienced ACEs. Out of the 4097 studies identified through the search, 326 were retrieved for full text screening and 25 were included in the final review. There was considerable heterogeneity in study design, outcome measures and the intervention being studied. The majority of studies were assessed to be of weak quality due to convenience sampling of participants and potential bias, indicating there is a lack of high quality research evidence to inform non-clinician delivered trauma-informed interventions for improving mental health outcomes in school-age young people. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based approaches are tentatively suggested as a suitable target for future rigorous evaluations of interventions addressing ACE-related trauma recovery and mental health improvement in school-age young people.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual Participant Data Network Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol 96%
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 96%
- Suicide prevention curriculum development for health and social care students: Protocol for a scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Athletes’ access to, attitudes towards, and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: A scoping review protocol 94%
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 92%
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 92%
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suicide and self-harm in low- and middle- income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review 94%
- Mechanisms for the prevention of adolescent intimate partner violence: a realist review of interventions in low- and middle-income countries 93%
- Correlates of behavioral and emotional disorders among school-going adolescents in Uganda 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between sexual violence and depression is mediated by perceived social support among female University students in the Kingdom of Eswatini 93%
- Interrupting the intergenerational cycle of violence: protocol for a three-generational longitudinal mixed-methods study in South Africa (INTERRUPT_VIOLENCE) 92%
- Global Measurement of Physical Intimate Partner Violence to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 5 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.