Back

The impact of depression and childhood maltreatment experiences on psychological adaptation from lockdown to relaxation periods during the COVID-19 pandemic

Herpertz, J.; Goltermann, J.; Gruber, M.; Blitz, R.; Taylor, J.; Brosch, K.; Stein, F.; Straube, B.; Meinert, S.; Kraus, A.; Leehr, E. J.; Repple, J.; Redlich, R.; Gutfleisch, L.; Besteher, B.; Ratzsch, J.; Winter, A.; Bonnekoh, L. M.; Emden, D.; Kircher, T.; Nenadic, I.; Dannlowski, U.; Hahn, T.; Opel, N.

2023-10-10 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.10.10.23296796 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a significant challenge to societal mental health. Yet, it remains unknown which factors influence the mental adaptation from lockdown to subsequent relaxation periods, particularly for vulnerable groups. This study used smartphone-based monitoring to explore how 74 individuals with major depression (MDD) and 77 healthy controls (HCs) responded to the transition from lockdown to relaxation during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 21 to November 01, 2020) regarding interpersonal interactions, COVID-19-related fear (fear of participants own health, the health of close relatives, and the pandemics economic impact), and the feeling of isolation. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of a diagnosis of MDD and the experience of childhood maltreatment (CM) on adaptive functioning. During the transition from lockdown to relaxation, we observed an increase in direct contacts and a decrease in indirect contacts and self-perceived isolation in the study population. The diagnosis of MDD and the experience of CM moderated a maintenance of COVID-19-related fear: HCs and participants without the experience of CM showed a decrease in fear, while fear of participants with MDD and with an experience of CM did not change significantly. The finding that elevated COVID-19-related fear was sustained in vulnerable groups after lockdown measures were lifted could help guide psychosocial prevention efforts in future pandemic emergencies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.