Back

The impact of depression and childhood maltreatment experiences on psychological adaptation from lockdown to relaxation periods during the COVID-19 pandemic

Herpertz, J.; Goltermann, J.; Gruber, M.; Blitz, R.; Taylor, J.; Brosch, K.; Stein, F.; Straube, B.; Meinert, S.; Kraus, A.; Leehr, E. J.; Repple, J.; Redlich, R.; Gutfleisch, L.; Besteher, B.; Ratzsch, J.; Winter, A.; Bonnekoh, L. M.; Emden, D.; Kircher, T.; Nenadic, I.; Dannlowski, U.; Hahn, T.; Opel, N.

2023-10-10 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.10.10.23296796 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a significant challenge to societal mental health. Yet, it remains unknown which factors influence the mental adaptation from lockdown to subsequent relaxation periods, particularly for vulnerable groups. This study used smartphone-based monitoring to explore how 74 individuals with major depression (MDD) and 77 healthy controls (HCs) responded to the transition from lockdown to relaxation during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 21 to November 01, 2020) regarding interpersonal interactions, COVID-19-related fear (fear of participants own health, the health of close relatives, and the pandemics economic impact), and the feeling of isolation. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of a diagnosis of MDD and the experience of childhood maltreatment (CM) on adaptive functioning. During the transition from lockdown to relaxation, we observed an increase in direct contacts and a decrease in indirect contacts and self-perceived isolation in the study population. The diagnosis of MDD and the experience of CM moderated a maintenance of COVID-19-related fear: HCs and participants without the experience of CM showed a decrease in fear, while fear of participants with MDD and with an experience of CM did not change significantly. The finding that elevated COVID-19-related fear was sustained in vulnerable groups after lockdown measures were lifted could help guide psychosocial prevention efforts in future pandemic emergencies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
4
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
6
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
10
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
20
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%