AP-LASR: Automated Protein Libraries from Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction
VanAntwerp, J.; Mardikoraem, M.; Pascual, N.; Woldring, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundAncestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) provides an informative roadmap of evolutionary protein sequence space that benefits protein design and engineering in pursuit of high stability and diverse functionality. Using statistical and biological knowledge, ASR can determine the most probable ancestor among potential alternative amino acid states. However, the inherent uncertainty of ASR can be further leveraged to determine viable "nearby" ancestors with wide-ranging functionalities by sampling alternative amino acid states. ResultsHere we introduce AP-LASR which i) automates ASR and ii) leverages uncertainty in ASR to generate diverse protein sequence libraries that consist of ancestral sequences and near-ancestor sequences. In addition to automating pre-processing tasks (e.g., data cleaning, multiple sequence alignment, and software dependency management), AP-LASR offers several user-definable hyperparameters (e.g., input data size, ancestral probability cut-off, and sequence supplementation) to control the properties of the generated library. AP-LASR features an improved eLnP score (a metric for quantifying reconstructed ancestral sequence confidence) compared to FireProtASR, a well-established ASR workflow, for all four functionally diverse protein families studied. Furthermore, the rigorous statistical analysis undertaken in this study elucidates the influence of hyperparameters on ASR, enabling researchers to refine AP-LASR to their specific research. ConclusionAP-LASR offers an automated ASR experience that surpasses existing software by including a novel library design feature, powering curated protein libraries for wet-lab evaluation. We demonstrate how computational parameters impact the quality of ASR results, library composition, and the tradeoffs therein. AP-LASR offers a powerful tool for protein engineers to efficiently navigate the vast protein sequence landscape. Software available at: https://github.com/WoldringLabMSU/AP-LASR
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards a comprehensive view of the pocketome universe - biological implications and algorithmic challenges. 94%
- Designing diverse and high-performance proteins with a large language model in the loop 94%
- Paying Attention to Attention: High Attention Sites as Indicators of Protein Family and Function in Language Models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.