Back

Assessing health equity in wastewater monitoring programs: Differences in the demographics and social vulnerability of sewered and unsewered populations across North Carolina

Hu, X. C.; Reckling, S. K.; Keshaviah, A.

2023-10-07 public and global health Community evaluation
10.1101/2023.10.06.23296680 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWastewater monitoring is a valuable tool to track community-level disease trends. However, the extent to which vulnerable populations have been included in statewide wastewater monitoring programs remains unstudied. ObjectivesWe conducted a geospatial analysis to examine (1) the representativeness of wastewater data collected through the North Carolina Wastewater Monitoring Network as of June 2022, and (2) the potential of wastewater data to generalize to unsewered populations in the county. MethodsAfter intersecting wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) service areas (sewersheds) with census block and tract boundaries for 38 WWTPs across 18 counties, we compared the demographics and social vulnerability of (1) people residing in sewersheds of monitored WWTPs with countywide and statewide populations, and (2) people connected to any sewer system--regardless of inclusion in wastewater monitoring--with unsewered populations. We flagged differences greater than +/-5 percentage points or percent (for categorical and continuous variables, respectively) and noted which were statistically significant (i.e., greater than twice the margin of error). ResultsAs a whole, populations in monitored sewersheds resembled the statewide population on most demographics analyzed, with a few exceptions. When multiple WWTPs were monitored within a county, their combined service populations resembled the countywide population, although populations in individually monitored sewersheds sometimes differed from the countywide population. In nine counties for which we had comprehensive sewershed maps, we found that sewered residents had higher social vulnerability, a greater share of Hispanics and African Americans, lower income, and lower educational attainment than unsewered residents. DiscussionOur results suggest that wastewater monitoring in North Carolina well represents the larger community. Ongoing analyses will be needed as sites are added or removed. The approach we present here can be used to ensure that wastewater surveillance programs nationwide are implemented in a manner that informs equitable public health decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
7
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
10
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
20
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
24
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%