Back

Comparing the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check and the Polypill Prevention Programmes in the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes.

Wald, N. J.; Hingorani, A. D.; Vale, S.; Bestwick, J. P.; Morris, J.

2023-10-12 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.10.06.23296215
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the NHS Health Check Programme with the Polypill Prevention Programme in the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes. DesignUse of published data and methodology to produce flow charts of the two programmes to determine screening performance and heart attacks and strokes prevented. SettingThe UK population. InterventionThe NHS Health Check Programme using a QRisk score on people aged 40-74 to select those eligible for a statin is compared with the Polypill Prevention programme in people aged 50 or more to select people for a combination of a statin and 3 low dose blood pressure lowering agents. In both programmes people had no history of heart attack or stroke. Main outcome measuresIn 1000 people the number of heart attacks and strokes prevented in the two programmes. ResultsAssuming 100% uptake and adherence to the screening protocol, in every 1000 persons, the NHS Health Check Programme would prevent 287 cases of a heart attack or stroke in individuals who would gain on average about 4 years of life without a heart attack or stroke, the precise gain depending on the extent of treatment for those with raised blood pressure, and 136 would be prescribed statins with no benefit. The corresponding figures for the Polypill Prevention Programme are 316 individuals who would, on average, gain 8 years of life without a heart attack or stroke with 260 prescribed the polypill with no benefit. Based on published estimates of uptake and adherence to of the NHS Health Check programme, only 24 cases per 1000 are currently benefitting instead of 287. This result could be achieved in the Polypill Prevention Programme with just 8% (24/316) of the eligible population taking part. ConclusionsThe Polypill Prevention Programme is by design simpler with the potential of preventing many more heart attacks and strokes; even an uptake of 40% would represent a 5-fold greater preventive effect than the NHS Health Check Programme.

Matching journals

1
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 4%
4.8× avg
2
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
#1
87× avg
3
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
#1
94× avg
4
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 0.5%
15× avg
5
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 2%
22× avg
6
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 68%
5.0%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 5%
6.3× avg
8
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 5%
3.9× avg
9
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 4%
10× avg
10
BMJ
BMJ · based on 49 published papers
Top 3%
6.8× avg
11
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
9.9× avg
12
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
20× avg
13
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 4%
5.7× avg
14
The Lancet Digital Health
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 2%
7.6× avg
15
Atherosclerosis
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 3%
9.3× avg
16
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
17
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 2%
5.7× avg
18
Trials
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 24 published papers
Top 4%
4.6× avg
19
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Elsevier BV · based on 10 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
20
Nature Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 88 published papers
Top 17%
0.7%
21
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 4%
4.3× avg
22
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 86%
0.7%
23
Stroke
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 3%
3.3× avg
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 65 published papers
Top 9%
2.1× avg