Comparing the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check and the Polypill Prevention Programmes in the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes.
Wald, N. J.; Hingorani, A. D.; Vale, S.; Bestwick, J. P.; Morris, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the NHS Health Check Programme with the Polypill Prevention Programme in the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes. DesignUse of published data and methodology to produce flow charts of the two programmes to determine screening performance and heart attacks and strokes prevented. SettingThe UK population. InterventionThe NHS Health Check Programme using a QRisk score on people aged 40-74 to select those eligible for a statin is compared with the Polypill Prevention programme in people aged 50 or more to select people for a combination of a statin and 3 low dose blood pressure lowering agents. In both programmes people had no history of heart attack or stroke. Main outcome measuresIn 1000 people the number of heart attacks and strokes prevented in the two programmes. ResultsAssuming 100% uptake and adherence to the screening protocol, in every 1000 persons, the NHS Health Check Programme would prevent 287 cases of a heart attack or stroke in individuals who would gain on average about 4 years of life without a heart attack or stroke, the precise gain depending on the extent of treatment for those with raised blood pressure, and 136 would be prescribed statins with no benefit. The corresponding figures for the Polypill Prevention Programme are 316 individuals who would, on average, gain 8 years of life without a heart attack or stroke with 260 prescribed the polypill with no benefit. Based on published estimates of uptake and adherence to of the NHS Health Check programme, only 24 cases per 1000 are currently benefitting instead of 287. This result could be achieved in the Polypill Prevention Programme with just 8% (24/316) of the eligible population taking part. ConclusionsThe Polypill Prevention Programme is by design simpler with the potential of preventing many more heart attacks and strokes; even an uptake of 40% would represent a 5-fold greater preventive effect than the NHS Health Check Programme.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on recorded blood pressure screening and hypertension management in England: An analysis of monthly changes in Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators in OpenSAFELY 93%
- Effect of a mobile health intervention optimised with artificial intelligence on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults with high blood pressure: Rationale and design of My Intelligent Cardiac Assistant (MICArdiac) Randomised Controlled Trial 93%
- OpenSAFELY: impact of national guidance on switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in early phase of COVID-19 pandemic in England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 93%
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 93%
- ‘Self-Management Intervention through Lifestyle Education for Kidney health’ (the SMILE-K study): protocol for a single-blind longitudinal randomised control trial with nested pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 93%
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 92%
- Predictive performance and clinical application of COV50, a urinary proteomic biomarker in early COVID-19 infection: a cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Colchicine for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial 92%
- Association between oral anticoagulants and COVID-19 related outcomes: two cohort studies 91%
- Trends and variation in prescribing of suboptimal statin treatment regimes: a cohort study in English primary care 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are Statins Optimally Prescribed to Reduce Stroke Risk in Patients with Hypercholesterolaemia? A population-based Longitudinal Study Using Electronic Health Records in South London (2005-2021) 93%
- Bleeding in cardiac patients prescribed antithrombotic drugs: Electronic health record phenotyping algorithms, incidence, trends and prognosis 92%
- Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.