Absence of Care Among Community-Living Older Persons with Dementia and Functional Limitations: A Cross-National Analysis of Population Survey from 22 Countries
Lin, Z.; Qian, Y.; Gill, T. M.; Hou, X.; Chen, S.; Chen, X.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe provision of long-term care for persons living with dementia (PLWD) who have functional limitations is a significant global public health challenge. However, there is limited evidence on the patterns of care received by PLWD across countries and regions. This study aimed to examine the global trends in the absence of care for PLWD with functional limitations and identify potential sociodemographic disparities. MethodsWe used harmonized longitudinal survey data from four Health and Retirement Global Family of Studies that surveyed community-living persons aged 50 and older in the United States, England, 18 European countries and Israel, and China. The analysis focused on persons who reported functional limitations and developed dementia during the study periods (2012-2018). Functional limitations were assessed using activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Absence of care was evaluated as the proportion of PLWD receiving no care for their ADL/IADL limitations. ResultsAt least 20% of PLWD in both developed and developing countries received no care for their functional limitations, and this absence of care remained stable over time. The absence of care was notable for both ADL and IADL limitations, as well as for informal and formal care. Moreover, substantial disparities were observed, with less-educated individuals and those living alone experiencing greater absence of formal and informal care, respectively. These patterns and trends were consistent across all countries and regions studied. Discussion and ImplicationsThe findings underscore the pressing need to ensure basic care provision for persons with dementia and functional limitations, especially for those who are less educated or living alone. Policymakers should prioritize addressing these disparities and improving care provision for this population worldwide.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam COVID-19 exposure index: a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of the pandemic on daily functioning of older adults 94%
- Validation of the German version of the Life-Space Assessment LSA-D 93%
- Association of social isolation, loneliness, and genetic risk with incidence of dementia: UK Biobank cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia - A scoping review 93%
- Frailty and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: Examining reciprocal associations within a measurement burst design 92%
- Do Assisted Living Facilities That Offer a Dementia Care Program Differ from Those That Do Not? A Population-Level Cross-Sectional Study in Ontario, Canada 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 94%
- Loneliness and Cognitive Decline Among U.S. Adults: A Stratified Analysis of the BRFSS 94%
- Development and validation of prediction models for predicting social care strengths and vulnerability in older people: Cohort study using routine data in Adult Social Care 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial Composition in K-12 Schooling and Cognitive Health of Older Black Adults 93%
- Race/Ethnic Disparities in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: The Northern Manhattan Study 92%
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with young-onset dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review with meta-analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.