Identification of watermelon genes involved in the ZYMV interaction through a miRNA bioinformatics analysis and characterization of ATRIP and RBOHB
Berbati, M.; Bousali, M.; Kaldis, A.; Moravec, T.; Karamitros, T.; Voloudakis, A. E.
Show abstract
Small RNA sequencing of healthy and ZYMV-infected watermelon (21 dpi) was performed and bioinformatics analysis identified 353 miRNAs from which 22 known and 331 new miRNAs. Important information about their precursors, their length, the loci of which they originated on watermelon genome are provided. The ZYMV genome could be a target for mir396a-3p, miR8706a, and miR1886i-5p from the miRbase, but none of them was identified in the watermelon miRNAome. Furthermore, watermelon miRNAome does not contain a miRNA targeting ZYMV genome with an expectation score [≤] 3.5. There were 34 resistance genes (CC-NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS-LRR, TIR-NBS) predicted as targets of 32 miRNAs in healthy watermelon. For nine differentially expressed miRNAs the respective target genes (10 in total) were bioinformatically predicted. For cla-new_miR307 (upregulated upon ZYMV infection) and cla-miR166h-3p (downregulated upon ZYMV infection) the targets were predicted to be ClaATRIP and ClaRBOHB, respectively, with ClaATRIP downregulated and ClaRBOHB upregulated upon ZYMV infection. ALSV-mediated VIGS of ClaATRIP rendered watermelon plants more resistant to ZYMV, whereas VIGS of ClaRBOHB resulted in higher levels of ZYMV titer in watermelon. These data suggest that ClaATRIP and ClaRBOHB are a susceptibility and resistant gene, respectively. Our results provide new insights in watermelon miRNAome and could propose new strategies for generating resistant watermelon to ZYMV. HighlightsO_LIBioinformatics analysis in healthy and ZYMV-infected watermelon plants gave 353 miRNAs, 22 known and 331 new. C_LIO_LIThe watermelon miRNAome identified in the present study does not appear to target the ZYMV genome (sense and reverse complement). C_LIO_LIThe differential expression of ten genes of watermelon in relation to ZYMV infection was validated. C_LIO_LIThe silencing of the two genes, ATRIP and RBOHB, through VIGS strongly suggested that ATRIP is a gene of susceptibility and RBOHB is a gene of resistance. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MiRNA expression profiling and zeatin dynamic changes in a new model system of in vivo indirect regeneration of tomato 95%
- Structural and functional analysis of genes with potential involvement in resistance to coffee leaf rust: a functional marker based approach 95%
- Genome-wide analysis of long noncoding RNAs, 24-nt siRNAs, DNA methylation and H3K27me3 marks in Brassica rapa and related species 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA-Seq Time Series of Vitis vinifera Bud Development Reveals Correlation of Expression Patterns with the Local Temperature Profile 94%
- A jasmonate-responsive ERF transcription factor regulates steroidal glycoalkaloid biosynthesis genes in eggplant 93%
- Differential detection of Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) using CRISPR-Cas12 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative RNA-seq analysis of resistant and susceptible banana genotypes reveals molecular mechanisms in response to Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) 94%
- Comparative Analysis, Diversification and Functional Validation of Plant Nucleotide-Binding Site Domain Genes 94%
- Metabolically engineered plant cell cultures as biofactories for the production of high-value carotenoid pigments astaxanthin and canthaxanthin 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide analysis of lncRNAs points to their roles in the modulation of developmental regulator expression during plant male germline development 94%
- Engineering the AEG1 promoter from cotton to develop male sterile lines 92%
- Multifactorial analysis of terminator performance on heterologous gene expression in Physcomitrella 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.