Trends in Healthcare Service Disruptions and Associations with COVID-19 Outcomes among Patients with SMI vs. Non-SMI during COVID-19
Thiruvalluru, R. K.; Sharma, M. m.; Weissman, M. M.; Olfson, M.; keyes, K. M.; Pathak, J.; Xiao, Y.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe study aims to quantify differential trends in emergency, outpatient, and inpatient healthcare service utilization among among 2,540,348 patients with and without severe mental illness (SMI) before (January 2017 - December 2019) and during (January 2020 - April 2022) the COVID-19 pandemic, across three distinct cohorts tracked from January 2017 to April 2022, based on their SMI status. Design & SettingA retrospective cohort study was conducted, utilizing data from Healthix, the second-largest health information exchange in the U.S. ParticipantsThe study population included 2,540,348 patients were categorized by their SMI status as of January 2017 to December 2019 into three groups: Severe Mental Illness 137,801 (5.4%), Other Mental Illness 685,280 (27%), No Mental Illness 1,717,267 (67.6%). ExposuresThe primary exposure was the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on its impact on mental health and non mental health services. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the rate of utilization of mental health and non mental health services. ResultsAmong the non-SMI patients, there was a 30% decline in emergency visits from 650,000 pre-COVID to 455,000 post-COVID (OR=0.70, p < 0.001), and outpatient visits decreased by 50% from 1.2 million to 600,000 (OR=0.50, p = 0.002). In contrast, the SMI group witnessed a 20% reduction in outpatient visits from 120,000 to 96,000 (OR=0.80, p = 0.015) and a 40% decrease in inpatient visits from 50,000 to 30,000 (OR=0.60, p = 0.008). Recurrent SMI patients exhibited a 25% decline in emergency visits from 32,000 to 24,000 (OR=0.75, p = 0.03) and a 35% drop in outpatient visits from 40,000 to 26,000 (OR=0.65, p = 0.009). The pandemic influenced the type of disorders diagnosed. Non-SMI patients experienced a 23% rise in anxiety-related disorders (n=80,000, OR=1.23, p = 0.01) and an 18% increase in stress-related disorders (n=70,000, OR=1.18, p = 0.04). SMI patients had a 15% surge in severe anxiety disorders (n=9,000, OR=1.15, p = 0.02) and a 12% uptick in substance-related disorders (n=7,200, OR=1.12, p = 0.05). Recurrent SMI patients showed a 20% increase in anxiety and adjustment disorders (n=6,400, OR=1.20, p = 0.03). SMI patients were more adversely affected by COVID-19, with a higher infection rate of 7.8% (n=45,972) compared to 4.2% (n=131,669) in non-SMI patients (OR=1.88, p < 0.001). Hospitalization rates also followed this trend, with 5.2% (n=30,648) of SMI patients being hospitalized compared to 3.7% (n=115,995) among non-SMI patients (OR=1.41, p = 0.007). Moreover, SMI patients had lower vaccination rates of 45.6% (n=268,888) versus 58.9% (n=1,844,261) among non-SMI patients (OR=0.77, p = 0.019). ConclusionsIn conclusion, our findings reveal significant disparities in healthcare service utilization between individuals with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) and those without. Notably, the SMI cohort experienced greater disruptions in service continuity, with a more pronounced decline in both outpatient and inpatient visits. Furthermore, the types of disorders diagnosed among this group also saw a shift, emphasizing the need for specialized care and attention during times of crisis. The higher rates of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization among SMI patients compared to non-SMI patients underscore the urgency of targeted public health interventions for this vulnerable group. The lower vaccination rates in the SMI cohort highlight another layer of healthcare disparity that needs to be urgently addressed. These findings suggest that the pandemic has amplified pre-existing inequalities in healthcare access and outcomes for individuals with SMI, calling for immediate, evidence-based interventions to mitigate these effects and ensure equitable healthcare service provision.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Associated with Mental Health Outcomes in Oman during COVID19: Frontline vs Non-frontline Healthcare Workers 95%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 95%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnoses of common mental health disorders in adults in Catalonia, Spain 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loneliness among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a linked UK population cohort study 95%
- Anxiety and Depression among Medical Doctors in Catalonia, Italy, and the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental Health Impact of COVID-19: A global study of risk and resilience factors 95%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 95%
- COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. An N=18147 web-based survey. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 95%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of UK healthcare workers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Needs Assessment: Development of a Simplified Risk Probability Scale (SRPS) Design for Rapid Mental Health Screening in Emergency Frontline Rescue Teams 95%
- How different pre-existing mental disorders and their co-occurrence affects clinical outcomes of COVID-19? A study based on real-world data in the Southern United States 94%
- Time trends of mental health indicators in Germany’s adult population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.