INAEME: Integral Neoantigen Analysis with Entirety of Mutational Events
Kovacevic, V.; Ilic Raicevic, N.; Milicevic, O.
10.1101/2023.09.28.559901 bioRxivShow abstract
Neoantigens are peptides on the surface of cancer cells presented to the immune system. Multiple novel therapeutic approaches involve the administration of neoantigens to trigger immunity-induced tumor regression. Identification of neoantigens includes a personalized approach consisting of detailed analyses of the sequenced tumor tissue and its comparison with wild type to identify somatic mutations. Alternated peptides are translated from nucleotides around somatic mutations and their binding affinity and immunogenicity need to be further evaluated. Still, the entire bioinformatics analysis is very complex, and accurate prediction of the neoantigen candidates represents a true challenge. Here, we present the novel, integral bioinformatic analysis workflow for neoantigen discovery, denoted INAEME (Integral Neoantigen Analysis with Entirety of Mutational Events). The workflow performs integral processing of an individuals DNA tumor-normal and RNA tumor raw reads to output prioritized neoantigen candidates. Our evaluation analysis includes a wide scope of mutational events so far not considered in the existing solutions, including phasing of variants, influence of both somatic and germline variants, positions of all transcripts, neighboring variants, and frameshifts. The influence of each mutational event on the accuracy of predicted neoantigen candidates is tested across 300 TCGA samples from multiple cancer types. The obtained results have demonstrated the significance of considering the entirety of mutational events to obtain an accurate set of strong neoantigen candidates for cancer immunotherapy targets or vaccines. The adaption of the described methods in the bioinformatics analysis minimizes the existence of false positives which are only later discovered in a laboratory environment using expensive methods such as mass spectrometry or microscopy.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- pyCancerSig: subclassifying human cancer with comprehensive single nucleotide, structural and microsatellite mutational signature deconstruction from whole genome sequencing 95%
- driveR: A Novel Method for Prioritizing Cancer Driver Genes Using Somatic Genomics Data 95%
- NERVE 2.0: boosting the New Enhanced Reverse Vaccinology Environment via artificial intelligence and a user-friendly web interface 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multiple Peptides Vaccine against nCOVID-19 Designed from the Nucleocapsid phosphoprotein (N) and Spike Glycoprotein (S) via the Immunoinformatics Approach 93%
- Zika viral proteome analysis reveals an epitope cluster within NS3 helicase as a potential vaccine candidate: an in silico study 92%
- Finding Consensus miRNAs Silencing KLF1 Expression as A Promising Therapeutic Option of Sickle Cell Anemia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling and analysis of site-specific mutations in cancer identifies known plus putative novel hotspots and bias due to contextual sequences 94%
- Wide and Deep Learning for Automatic Cell Type Identification 94%
- Analysis of Mutations in Precision Oncology using The Automated, Accurate, and User-Friendly Web Tool PredictONCO 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.