Generative Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Communication: Implications for Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Health Care.
Hanai, A.; Ishikawa, T.; Kawauchi, S.; Iida, Y.; Kawakami, E.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in facilitating clinical communication, particularly in addressing sexual health concerns, which are often challenging for patients to discuss. MethodsWe employed the Generative Pre-trained Transformer-3.5 (GPT) as the generative AI platform and utilized DocsBot for citation retrieval (June 2023). A structured prompt was devised to generate 100 questions from the AI, based on epidemiological survey data regarding sexual difficulties among cancer survivors. These questions were submitted to Bot1 (standard GPT) and Bot2 (sourced from two clinical guidelines). The responses from both bots were compared to assess consistency and adherence to clinical guidelines. ResultsOur analysis revealed no censorship of sexual expressions or medical terms. The most common themes among the generated questions were cancer treatment, sexual health, and advice. The similarity rate between responses from Bot1 and Bot2 averaged 92.5% (range 77.0% to 98.4%), with notably lower similarity for items not covered in the guidelines. Despite the lack of reflection on guideline recommendations, counseling and other non-pharmacological interventions were significantly more prevalent in both bots responses compared to drug interventions, with odds ratios of 4.8 (p=0.04) in Bot1 and 14.9 (p<0.001) in Bot2. DiscussionGenerative AI can serve for providing health information on sensitive topics such as sexual health, despite the potential for policy-restricted content. There was a significant skew towards non-pharmacological interventions in responses, possibly due to the prohibitive nature of medical topics. This shift warrants attention as it could potentially trigger patients expectations for non-pharmacological interventions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 94%
- “Is this Herpes or Syphilis?”: Latent Dirichlet Allocation Analysis of Sexually Transmitted Disease-Related Reddit Posts During the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 94%
- Harnessing the Open Access Version of ChatGPT for Enhanced Clinical Opinions 93%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 92%
- Network Graph Representation of COVID-19 Scientific Publications to Aid Knowledge Discovery 92%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 92%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 91%
- Toward Using Twitter Data to Monitor Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnancy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthetic Data Generation in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of reviews on domains, motivations, and future applications 93%
- Development and Evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records 91%
- Performance of Advanced Large Language Models (GPT-4o, GPT-4, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Claude 3 Opus) on Japanese Medical Licensing Examination: A Comparative Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.