Leveraging GPT-4 for Identifying Clinical Phenotypes in Electronic Health Records: A Performance Comparison between GPT-4, GPT-3.5-turbo and spaCy's Rule-based & Machine Learning-based methods
BHATTARAI, K.; Oh, I. Y.; Sierra, J. M.; Payne, P. R.; Abrams, Z. B.; Lai, A. M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveAccurately identifying clinical phenotypes from Electronic Health Records (EHRs) provides additional insights into patients health, especially when such information is unavailable in structured data. This study evaluates the application of OpenAIs Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-4 model to identify clinical phenotypes from EHR text in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The goal was to identify disease stages, treatments and progression utilizing GPT-4, and compare its performance against GPT-3.5-turbo, Flan-T5-xl, Flan-T5-xxl, and two rule-based and machine learning-based methods, namely, scispaCy and medspaCy. Materials and MethodsPhenotypes such as initial cancer stage, initial treatment, evidence of cancer recurrence, and affected organs during recurrence were identified from 13,646 records for 63 NSCLC patients from Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. The performance of the GPT-4 model is evaluated against GPT-3.5-turbo, Flan-T5-xxl, Flan-T5-xl, medspaCy and scispaCy by comparing precision, recall, and micro-F1 scores. ResultsGPT-4 achieved higher F1 score, precision, and recall compared to Flan-T5-xl, Flan-T5-xxl, medspaCy and scispaCys models. GPT-3.5-turbo performed similarly to that of GPT-4. GPT and Flan-T5 models were not constrained by explicit rule requirements for contextual pattern recognition. SpaCy models relied on predefined patterns, leading to their suboptimal performance. Discussion and ConclusionGPT-4 improves clinical phenotype identification due to its robust pre-training and remarkable pattern recognition capability on the embedded tokens. It demonstrates data-driven effectiveness even with limited context in the input. While rule-based models remain useful for some tasks, GPT models offer improved contextual understanding of the text, and robust clinical phenotype extraction.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Study of Calibration as a Measurement of Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Biomedical Research 96%
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 95%
- Large-Scale Deep Learning for Metastasis Detection in Pathology Reports 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.