Back

Indicators of Co-occurrence of Mood Disorder with Chronic Medical Conditions: Evidence from an Administrative Claims Data Analysis

Chhabria, K.; Hamden, R.; Krause, T. M.; Jabbi, M.

2023-09-27 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.09.26.23296173 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveMood disorder (including major depression and bipolar disorder) prevalence is over 10% and accounts for a significant share of global disease burden. Mental and physical illness are related, however, the association between mood disorders and acute/chronic disease subclasses remains poorly understood. MethodsThis observational cross-sectional study used administrative claims data from 6,709,258 adult enrollees with a full-year enrollment in the 2018 OPTUM Clinformatics(R) database. Data of enrollees with/without diagnoses of a mood disorder co-occurring with chronic comorbid conditions (defined by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index) using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) were analyzed by accounting for age, race, and ethnicity. ResultsOverall, the sample was predominantly non-Hispanic Caucasians (64.56%), with 48.59% females and a mean age of 43.54 years{+/-}12.46 years. The prevalence of mood disorders was 3.71% (248,890), of which 0.61% (n=40,616) had bipolar disorders and 3.10% (n=208,274) had Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Logistic regression odds ratios revealed a strong association between mood disorder diagnoses and peptic ulcers (2.11; CI=2.01-2.21), weight loss (2.53; CI, 2.46-2.61), renal failure (2.37, CI = 2.31-2.42), peripheral vascular disease (2.24; CI=2.19-2.30), and pulmonary circulation disorder (1.77; CI=1.70-1.84). ConclusionsOverall, mood disorders were associated with vascular and cardiac chronic medical conditions, suggesting a possible pathophysiological link between these conditions. The results highlight the importance of understanding the prevalence of co-occurring mood and medical conditions and may inform novel biological diagnostics and future identification of mechanisms for multimorbidity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.