Discovery of Urinary Metabolite Biomarkers of Psychiatric Disorders Using Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization
Zaki, J. K.; Tomasik, J.; McCune, J. A.; Scherman, O. A.; Bahn, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundPsychiatric disorders cause substantial patient suffering world-wide, which could be alleviated through the discovery of early diagnostic biomarkers. Urinary markers have promising practical applications; however, no robust urine biomarkers exist currently for psychiatric disorders. While the traditional biomarker discovery process is costly and time-consuming, genetic methods utilizing existing data from large-scale studies, such as Mendelian randomization, may provide an alternative, cost-effective approach to identifying such biomarkers. MethodsA two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted in R using GWAS data for seven psychiatric disorders from the Psychiatrics Genomics Consortium, as well as a meta-analysis of urinary metabolite GWAS studies and the GWAS Catalog. Mendelian randomization assumptions were assessed using the MR-Egger intercept, P-values, and genetic associations from the PhenoScanner database. OutcomesThe Mendelian randomization analysis revealed 67 analyte-disorder associations, of which 21 were exclusive to a single disorder. Most notable associations were observed between tyrosine and schizophrenia ({beta}=-0.041, SE=0.013, Q=0.027), and creatine and bipolar disorder ({beta}=-0.077, SE=0.019, Q=0.002), which validated across multiple studies, as well as that of pyridoxal ({beta}=0.10, SE=0.03, Q=0.042) and ferulic acid 4-sulfate ({beta}=0.077, SE=0.025, Q=0.037) to anorexia nervosa, and N,N-dimethylglycine to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ({beta}=-0.39, SE=0.11, Q=0.008). InterpretationThese results indicate an association between bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anorexia nervosa, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with urinary metabolite marker alterations. Most of the findings were supported by previous literature. The results provide a roadmap for future experimental and clinical validation of the identified biomarker candidates and demonstrate the utility of using genetic instruments for urinary biomarker discovery.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pairwise genetic meta-analyses between schizophrenia and substance dependence phenotypes reveals novel association signals 96%
- Alterations in Acylcarnitines, Amines, and Lipids Inform about Mechanism of Action of Citalopram/Escitalopram in Major Depression 95%
- Evaluating the role of common risk variation in the recurrence risk of schizophrenia in multiplex schizophrenia families 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Central oxidative stress and early vocational outcomes in first episode psychosis: A 7-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy study of glutathione 95%
- Increased Prevalence of Rare Copy Number Variants in Treatment-Resistant Psychosis 95%
- Promoter activity-based case-control association study on SLC6A4 highlighting hypermethylation and altered amygdala volume in male patients with schizophrenia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular phenotypes associated with antipsychotic drugs in the human caudate nucleus 95%
- Neuronal alterations in AKT isotype expression in schizophrenia 94%
- Interrelations Between Dopaminergic-, GABAergic- and Glutamatergic Neurotransmitters in Antipsychotic-Naïve Psychosis Patients and the Association to Initial Treatment Response 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impairment in acquisition of conditioned fear in schizophrenia: a pooled analysis of four studies 95%
- Estimating the direct effects of the genetic liabilities to bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and behavioral traits on suicide attempt using a multivariable Mendelian randomization approach 94%
- Interactions between hippocampal activity and striatal dopamine in people at clinical high risk for psychosis: relationship to clinical outcomes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.