Back

Mode of inheritance needs to be accounted for in interpreting genotype-phenotype links in monogenic disorders

Riera-Escamilla, A.; Welt, C. K.; Laan, M.

2023-09-27 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.09.26.23296051 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionA recently published study by Ke et al. utilized whole exome sequencing (WES) to screen genetic variants contributing to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) in a large cohort of 1,030 patients from China (doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02194-3). The authors reported that 285 likely pathogenic (LP) and pathogenic (P) variants identified in 79 genes contributed to POI in 242 study subjects, representing 23.5% of the cohort. The majority, 191 patients ([~]79%), carried monoallelic (heterozygous) variants. ObjectiveWe re-analyzed the contribution of reported genotypes considering the inheritance mode of POI and other inherited conditions linked to 79 genes with reported findings by Ke et al. MethodsThe disease inheritance modes linked to targeted genes were retrieved from publicly available databases (OMIM, Genomic England PanelApp, PubMed, DOMINO, gnomAD). Genotypes of 242 cases reported by Ke et al. were assessed in the context of known inheritance mode(s) of disorders linked to respective genes. ResultsMost, 48 of 79 genes were classified as recessive, whereas only 13 genes were dominant. Insufficient data was available for 18 genes to conclusively determine their inheritance mode. Nearly half of 242 cases reported by Ke et al., 119 women ([~]49%), carried heterozygous variants in known autosomal recessive genes and therefore these variants are not contributing to their POI phenotype. Only 68 of women (6.6%) carried biallelic variants in either recessive or dominant genes or monoallelic variants in dominant genes, hence contributing to the diagnostic yield. This is [~]3.5-fold lower than 23.5% claimed in Ke et al. Additional 56 women (5.4%) were reported monoallelic variants in genes with insufficient data to determine the inheritance mode or multiple heterozygous variants in >1 recessive gene, whereby oligogenic contribution to POI cannot be excluded. But when even including these cases, the maximum estimated contributing yield is [~]12%, two times lower than claimed. ConclusionUsing WES to screen monogenic causes of POI as part of the diagnostic pipeline will improve patient management strategies, but overestimated diagnostic yield in genetic research can create unrealistic expectations in the POI clinical community, typically non-specialist in genetics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
3
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.3%
5
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
10
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
11
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
12
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
15
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
16
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
21
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%
27
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%