Determination of phylogenetic relationships in the genus Mangifera based on whole chloroplast genome and nuclear genome sequences
Wijesundara, W. U.; Furtado, A.; Dillon, N.; Kharabian Masouleh, A.; Henry, R. J.
Show abstract
The genus Mangifera (Anacardiaceae) includes 69 species of which Mangifera indica L. is the most important and primarily cultivated species for commercial mango production. Although the species are classified based on morphological descriptors, molecular evidence has proposed the hybrid origin of two species suggesting the possibility that more of the species may be of hybrid origin. To analyze evolutionary relationships within the genus, 13 samples representing 11 Mangifera species were sequenced and whole chloroplast (Cp) genomes and 47 common single-copy nuclear gene sequences were assembled and used for phylogenetic analysis using concatenation and coalescence-based methods. The Cp genome size varied from 151,752 to 158,965 bp with M. caesia and M. laurina having the smallest and largest genomes, respectively. Genome annotation revealed 80 protein-coding genes, 31 tRNA and four rRNA genes across all the species. Comparative analysis of whole Cp genome sequence and nuclear gene-based phylogenies revealed topological conflicts suggesting chloroplast capture or cross hybridization. The Cp genomes of M. altissima, M. applanata, M. caloneura and M. lalijiwa were similar to those of M. indica (99.9% sequence similarity). Their close sequence relationship suggests a common ancestry and likely cross-hybridization between wild relatives and M. indica. This study provides improved knowledge of phylogenetic relationships in Mangifera, indicating extensive gene flow among the different species, suggesting that hybrids may be common within the genus.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Plastomes of Garcinia mangostana L. and comparative analysis with other Garcinia species 96%
- Comparison among the first representative chloroplast genomes of Orontium, Lasia, Zamioculcas, and Stylochaeton of the plant family Araceae: inverted repeat dynamics are not linked to phylogenetic signaling 95%
- Transcriptome sequence reveals candidate genes involving in the post-harvest hardening of trifoliate yam Dioscorea dumetorum 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular evidence for the hybrid origin of Cryptocoryne xpurpurea Ridl. nothovar. purpurea (Araceae) 96%
- Genome-wide DNA polymorphisms in four Actinidia arguta genotypes based on whole-genome re-sequencing 96%
- Complete Chloroplast Genome of Castanopsis sclerophylla (Lindl.) Schott: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular phylogenetics and micromorphology of Australasian Stipeae (Poaceae), and the interrelation of whole-genome duplication and evolutionary radiations in this grass tribe 94%
- Oat chromosome and genome evolution defined by widespread terminal intergenomic translocations in polyploids 94%
- Genome sequencing of Syzygium cumini (Jamun) reveals adaptive evolution in secondary metabolism pathways associated with its medicinal properties 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Plastid genomics of Nicotiana (Solanaceae): insights into molecular evolution, positive selection and the origin of the maternal genome of Aztec tobacco (Nicotiana rustica) 97%
- Transcriptome atlas of Phalaenopsis equestris 94%
- Genomic comparison of non-photosynthetic plants from the family Balanophoraceae with their photosynthetic relatives. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes indicated different origin for Indian Tea (Camellia assamica) cv TV-1 as compared to Chinese tea 97%
- Mitochondrial Genome of Garcinia mangostana L. variety Mesta 96%
- Genetic diversity and population structure of Luffa acutangula accessions in a Thailand collection using SNP markers 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.