Back

AAO2 impairment improves aldehyde detoxification by AAO3 in Arabidopsis leaves exposed to UVC or Rose Bengal.

Nurbekova, Z.; Srivastava, S.; Du, N. Z.; Tureckova, V.; Strnad, M.; Omarov, R.; Sagi, M.

2023-09-26 plant biology
10.1101/2023.09.22.559040 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Among the three active aldehyde oxidases in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves (AAO1-3), AAO3, which catalyzes the oxidation of abscisic-aldehyde to abscisic-acid, was shown recently to function as a reactive aldehyde detoxifier. Notably, aao2KO mutants exhibited less senescence symptoms and lower aldehyde accumulation, such as acrolein, benzaldehyde, and HNE than in wild-type leaves exposed to UV-C or Rose-Bengal. The effect of the absence of AAO2 expression on aldehyde detoxification by AAO3 and/or AAO1 was studied by comparing the response of wild-type plants to the response of aao1Single mutant, aao2KO mutants and single mutants of aao3Ss. Notably, aao3Ss exhibited similar aldehyde accumulation and chlorophyll content to aao2KO treated with UV-C or Rose-Bengal. In contrast, wild-type and aao1S exhibited higher aldehyde accumulation that resulted in lower remaining chlorophyll than in aao2KO leaves, indicating that the absence of active AAO2 enhanced AAO3 detoxification activity in aao2KO mutants. In support of this notion, employing abscisic-aldehyde as a specific substrate marker for AAO3 activity revealed enhanced AAO3 activity in aao2KO and aao3Ss leaves compared to wild-type treated with UV-C or Rose Bengal. The similar abscisic acid level accumulated in leaves of unstressed or stressed genotypes indicates that aldehyde detoxification by AAO3 is the cause for better stress resistance in aao2KO mutants. Employing the sulfuration process (known to activate aldehyde oxidases) in wild-type, aao2KO, and molybdenum-cofactor sulfurase (aba3-1) mutant plants revealed that the active AAO2 in WT employs sulfuration processes essential for AAO3 activity level, resulting in the lower AAO3 activity in WT than AAO3 activity in aao2KO.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
17.6%
2
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
6.1%
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
6
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
8
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
9
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
10
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
12
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
13
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
14
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
21
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Metallomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%