Back

A Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-center trial sub-study for the clinical effects of paridiprubart treatment in hospitalized critically ill patients with COVID-19 ARDS

Gordon, B.; Allum, F.; Brooks, M.; Rajakulendran, N.; Rampakakis, E.; Sampalis, J.; EB05 Study Investigators,

2023-09-27 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2023.09.21.23295853 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality is predominantly due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). There are currently limited treatment options for ARDS, a life-threatening condition with different etiologies, secondary to inflammation-induced lung injury. Paridiprubart is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4), a key player in ARDS pathophysiology. MethodsThis was a prespecified sub-study of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of paridiprubart in COVID-19 patients with ARDS receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and additional organ support. Efficacy outcomes were 28- and 60-day all-cause mortality, and improvement in COVID-19 severity and ventilation-free days at 28-days post-treatment. ResultsThirteen (13) and twenty (20) patients received paridiprubart and placebo, respectively. The groups were comparable for demographics and baseline parameters, except for higher kidney failure incidence and use of immune modulators and antivirals, and lower corticosteroids use in the paridiprubart group. Mortality at 28-days post-treatment was 7.7% (1/13) in the paridiprubart group versus 40.0% (8/20) for placebo (OR=0.125; 95% CI, 0.013-1.160; P=0.067; P[bootstrap]=0.011). 60-day mortality was 23.1% (3/13) in paridiprubart-treated patients and 45.0% (9/20) in placebo patients (OR=0.367; 95% CI, 0.077-1.749; P=0.208; P[bootstrap]=0.162). Mean survival time was 55.78 days for paridiprubart recipients compared to 41.44 days for placebo patients (HR=0.386; 95% CI, 0.077-1.436; P=0.156; P[bootstrap]=0.083). Although not statistically significant, results for other efficacy measures favored paridiprubart. Incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. ConclusionsIn COVID-19 patients with ARDS requiring invasive ventilation and organ support, paridiprubart was efficacious in preventing mortality and improving clinical outcomes, with no safety concerns.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
4
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
5
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
6
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
20
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
23
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%