Accurate somatic variant calling performance using Avidity Sequencing with Burning Rock OncoScreenTM Plus panel
Zhang, G.; Liu, Y.; Luo, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhang, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) comprehensive genomic profiling panels provide targeted genome-wide detection of the somatic variant landscape of various cancer types. Recently, an innovative sequencing technology, Avidity Sequencing from Element Biosciences, has emerged to provide economical option for mid-throughput sequencing, with high quality (Q40). AimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of AVITI sequencing by avidity on detection of somatic variants from reference samples, and to compare the variant detection concordance between AVITI and NovaSeq sequencing platforms by evaluating the variant callings of 518 cancer-related genes using Burning Rocks OncoScreenTM Plus panel. MethodsContrived commercial reference control samples (harboring known variants) and clinical Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded tissue (FFPE) samples were examined to evaluate the variant detection performance of two sequencing platforms, with respects to Single Nucleotide Variant (SNV), Insertion-Deletion (Indel), Structure Variant (SV/Fusion), Copy Number Variation (CNV), Microsatellite Instability (MSI), and Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB). Variant specific QC metrics were developed to evaluate sequencing-level and variant calling level accuracy. All samples were processed utilizing the OncoScreenTM Plus assay, including library preparation and bioinformatics post sequencing data analysis. ResultsThe OncoScreenTM Plus assay is compatible with the AVITI system. Samples prepared with the OncoScreenTM Plus panel and sequenced on the AVITI system has successfully detected cancer related variants including SNV/Indels, SV/Fusion, CNVs, MSIs, and TMB, which were highly concordant with reference controls. In addition, the AVITI system produced a higher overall quality score, index assignment rate, mean target coverage, and lower optical duplication rate AVITI than NovaSeq system. ConclusionThe new sequencing technology Avidity from AVITI system can be applied seamlessly to current high-performance targeted oncology assays to reliably identify somatic variants in a flexible and cost-effective manner.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating discordant somatic calls across mutation discovery approaches to minimize false negative drug-resistant findings 97%
- Clinical Validation and Diagnostic Utility of Optical Genome Mapping in Prenatal Diagnostic Testing 95%
- Validation of a Pan-Cancer NGS Liquid Biopsy Test for Routine Hospital Use: An International Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing sensitivity and coverage of clinical WGS as a diagnostic test for genetic disorders 95%
- Mutational profiling of micro-dissected pre-malignant lesions from archived specimens 92%
- Accuracy and Reproducibility of Somatic Point Mutation Calling in Clinical-Type Targeted Sequencing Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing 94%
- Performance of amplicon and capture based next-generation sequencing approaches for the epidemiological surveillance of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 and other variants of concern. 93%
- Exploring the Diagnostic Potential of miRNA Signatures in the Fabry Disease Serum: A Comparative Study of Automated and Manual Sample Isolations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.