Back

Social risk factors for pediatric asthma exacerbations: A systematic review

Vinjimoor, S.; Vieira, C.; Rogerson, C.; Owora, A.; Mendonca, E. A.

2023-09-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.09.19.23295732 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis systematic review aims to identify social risk factors that influence pediatric asthma exacerbations. MethodsCohort studies published between 2010 and 2020 were systematically searched on the OVID Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo databases. Using our established phased inclusion and exclusion criteria, studies that did not address a pediatric population, social risk factors, and asthma exacerbations were excluded. Out of a total of 707 initially retrieved articles, 3 prospective cohort and 6 retrospective cohort studies were included. ResultsUpon analysis of our retrieved studies, two overarching domains of social determinants, as defined by Healthy People 2030, were identified as major risk factors for pediatric asthma exacerbations: Social/Community Context and Neighborhood/Built Environment. Social/Community factors including African American race and inadequate caregiver perceptions were associated with increased risk for asthma exacerbations. Patients in high-risk neighborhoods, defined by lower levels of education, housing, and employment, had higher rates of emergency department readmissions and extended duration of stay. Additionally, a synergistic interaction between the two domains was found such that patients with public or no health insurance and residence in high-risk neighborhoods were associated with excess hospital utilization attributable to pediatric asthma exacerbations. ConclusionSocial risk factors play a significant role in influencing the frequency and severity of pediatric asthma exacerbations. 3-Question Summary BoxO_ST_ABS1. What is the current understanding of this subject?C_ST_ABSThe individual impact of social factors such as insurance, neighborhood, and ethnicity on pediatric asthma exacerbations has previously been explored. 2. What does this report add to the literature?This review systematically identifies the relative importance of individual sociodemographic factors and interactions between them. Race, neighborhood risk, insurance status, caregiver perceptions, and a synergistic interaction between health insurance status and neighborhood risk were found to be contributary. 3. What are the implications for public health practice?It is important for providers to educate patients on how their surroundings impact their respiratory health and advocate for increased healthcare access for at-risk populations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
4
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
5
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
11
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
15
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
22
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%