Cardiovascular Outcomes of Alpha-Blockers Versus 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors Among Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Jensen, B.; Zhang, J.; Latour, C.; Olawore, O.; Pate, V.; Friedlander, D.; Sturmer, T.; Funk, M. J.
Show abstract
ImportanceAlpha-blockers (AB) are widely prescribed for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the cardiovascular safety profile of these medications among patients with BPH is not well understood. ObjectiveTo compare the safety of ABs versus 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) for risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. DesignWe conducted an active comparator, new user, cohort study using insurance claims data from 2007-2019. SettingThis study used data from a 20% random sample of Medicare (U.S.) beneficiaries. ParticipantsMen between 66 and 90 years of age were indexed into the cohort at new use of an AB or 5ARI. We required 12 months of continuous enrollment and [≥]1 diagnosis code for BPH within 12 months prior to initiation. ExposuresExposure was defined by a qualifying prescription fill for either an AB or 5ARI after at least 12 months without a prescription for these drug classes. Main Outcomes and MeasuresFollow-up began at a qualified refill for the study drug. The primary study outcomes were (1) hospitalization for heart failure (HF); (2) composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (hospitalization for stroke, myocardial infarction, or death); (3) composite MACE or hospitalization for HF; and (4) death. We estimated inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighted 1-year risks, risk ratios (RRs), and risk differences (RDs) for each outcome. ResultsWe identified 163,846 and 26,040 initiators of ABs and 5ARIs, respectively. In our fully adjusted analyses, we found ABs, compared to 5ARIs, were associated with an increased 1-year risk of MACE (RR=1.08 [1.02, 1.13], RD=6.26 per 1,000 [2.15, 10.37]), composite MACE and HF (RR=1.07 [1.03, 1.12], RD=7.40 per 1,000 [2.88, 11.93]), and death (RR=1.07 [1.01, 1.14], RD=3.85 per 1,000 [0.40, 7.29]). We did not find a difference in risk for HF alone (RR=0.99 [0.92, 1.07], RD=-2.33 per 10,000 [-31.97, 27.31]). Conclusions and RelevanceThese results provide real-world evidence that ABs may be associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, though residual confounding may explain these findings. If replicated with detailed confounder data, these results could have important public health implications given the widespread use of these medications. Three Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the comparative risk of alpha-blockers versus 5-alpha reductase inhibitors for adverse cardiovascular outcomes among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia? FindingsWe found that use of alpha-blockers was associated with a small increase in risk for multiple adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. These results could be explained by unmeasured variables (e.g., blood pressure or body mass index). MeaningFirst-line use of alpha-blockers for BPH may result in a small increase in risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes including death. Widescale use of alpha-blockers (>5 million prescriptions/year) could amplify this risk.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 94%
- National Trends and Disparities in Hospitalization for Hypertensive Emergencies Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999–2019 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 96%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 93%
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events after Covid-19: a double-cohort study 94%
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 93%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Procedural and Pharmacological Interventions on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Markers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 96%
- Lipid-Modulating Agents for Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19 in Randomized Trials 91%
- Joint Association of Polygenic Risk and Social Determinants of Health with Coronary Heart Disease in the United States 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 93%
- Predicting the risk of motor vehicle crash in the first year after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation 92%
- Inequalities in access to and outcomes of cardiac surgery in England: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics (2010-2019) 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.