Specialty Organization Finances and Membership: A Closer Look
Syed, A.; Rahimy, E.; Sridhar, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundUnited States students and physicians face massive financial hurdles including student loan repayments, board certification fees, and other expenses. This project investigates an infrequently discussed topic, the costs to join and the finances of national specialty organizations. PurposeWe hope our findings encourage resident physicians and newly minted attendings to take interest in the handling of the fees they may pay to join a national organization. MethodsPublicly available IRS 990 filings and specialty organization websites were examined to compile data regarding membership fees, organization revenue, expenses, and top earner salaries for 29 total specialty organizations. Descriptive and inferential statistics including Pearson correlation coefficients were used to investigate the above data. ResultsThe average annual revenue and net assets for the organizations studied were $50,762,279 and $66,444,291, respectively. The average annual membership fee was $542. The largest ratios of membership fee to physician salary were in pediatrics (0.31%) and ophthalmology (0.26%). The average salary of the top three earners at specialty organizations was $429,758. ConclusionsThere is wide variability in the costs of joining medical specialty organizations in the United States that does not correlate with the average earning potential of individual specialties. As a whole, medical specialty organizations should consider greater financial transparency.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial Conflicts of Interest among U.S. Physician Authors of 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Study 94%
- Sunshine on KOL : a retrospective study about financial ties between medical key opinion leaders and pharmaceutical industry in France 92%
- Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures of Physician-Authors Publishing in High-Impact U.S. Medical Journals: A Comparison of the Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 90%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 90%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 93%
- Making the Match or Breaking it? Values, Perceptions, and Obstacles of Trainees Applying into Physician-Scientist Training Programs 93%
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Amortization of Funding Gene Therapies: Making the “Intangibles” Tangible for Patients 91%
- Drug company methodologies used for reporting in the UK pharmaceutical industry payment transparency database between 2015-2019: A content analysis 88%
- Do Faster-Trained Physicians Fill the Gaps? Geographic Concentration of Emergency Medicine physicians with different postgraduate training in Ontario Canada 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.