Back

The relationship between screen-based behaviors and adolescent mental health: a phenotypic and genetic analysis

Frei, E.; Jaholkowski, P. P.; Parekh, P.; Frei, O.; Shadrin, A. A.; Refsum Bakken, N.; Birkenaes, V.; Ask, H.; Andreassen, O. A.; Smeland, O. B.

2023-09-14 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.09.14.23295537 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundScreen use is linked to adverse mental health outcomes in adolescents, but differences across psychiatric diagnoses, mental symptoms, and types of screen-based activities remain unclear. Moreover, the extent to which genetic factors contribute to these associations is largely unknown. MethodsWe analysed longitudinal data from 23,790 adolescents (14-16 years of age) in the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), linking questionnaire responses on screen use to registry-based psychiatric diagnoses and self-reported mental symptoms. Using regression models, we assessed associations between mental health outcomes and gaming, social media use, and TV watching. We also evaluated whether genetic liability to major psychiatric disorders, as indexed by polygenic risk scores (PRSs), was associated with screen use, and estimated the degree of genetic confounding using genetic sensitivity analyses. FindingsSpending 3-4 hours/day or more on any screen-based activity was associated with increased odds of a lifetime diagnosis of depressive, anxiety/stress-related, and hyperkinetic disorders. Similarly, minimal social media engagement was associated with increased odds of any psychiatric diagnosis, most strongly with pervasive developmental disorders. Associations with mental symptoms closely followed those observed for clinical diagnoses. The PRSs of major depression, anorexia nervosa, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorder were significantly associated with screen use, suggesting shared genetic liability. Genetic sensitivity analyses indicated that a substantial proportion of the observed phenotypic associations may be attributable to genetic factors. InterpretationOur findings suggest a complex, bidirectional relationship between screen use and adolescent mental health, across both mental disorders and traits. Both high and low screen use may reflect underlying mental health vulnerabilities. The associations appear partly driven by shared genetic susceptibility, underscoring the importance of accounting for individual risk. These results support the need for individualized, context-sensitive digital media use guidelines. FundingResearch Council of Norway (Grant N{degrees}324499).

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
2
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
4
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
7
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
11
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
16
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
19
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
22
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
24
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%