Back

In vivo selection in non-human primates identifies superior AAV capsids for on-target CSF delivery to spinal cord

Hanlon, K. S.; Cheng, M.; De La Cruz, D.; Patel, N.; Santoscoy, M. C.; Gong, Y.; Ng, C.; Nguyen, D. M.; Nammour, J.; Clark, S. W.; Kozarsky, K.; Maguire, C. A.

2023-09-13 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.09.13.557506 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Systemic administration of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors for spinal cord gene therapy has challenges including toxicity at high doses and pre-existing immunity that reduces efficacy. Intrathecal delivery of AAV vectors into the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) can avoid many of the issues of systemic delivery, although achieving broad distribution of the vector and transgene expression throughout the spinal cord is challenging and vector entry to the periphery occurs, sometimes initiating hepatotoxicity. Here we performed two rounds of in vivo biopanning in non-human primates (NHPs) with an AAV9 peptide display library injected intrathecally and performed insert sequencing on DNA isolated from either whole tissue (conventional selection), isolated nuclei, or nuclei from transgene-expressing cells. A subsequent barcoded pool of candidates and AAV9 was compared at the DNA (biodistribution) and RNA (expression) level in spinal cord and liver of intrathecally injected NHPs. Most of the candidates displayed enhanced biodistribution compared to AAV9 at all levels of spinal cord ranging from 2 to 265-fold. Nuclear isolation or expression-based selection yielded 4 of 7 candidate capsids with enhanced transgene expression in spinal cord (up to 2.4-fold), while no capsid obtained by conventional selection achieved that level. Furthermore, several capsids displayed lower biodistribution to the liver of up to 1,250-fold, compared to AAV9, providing a remarkable on target/off target biodistribution ratio. These capsids may have potential for gene therapy programs directed at the spinal cord and the selection method described here should be useful in clinically relevant large animal models.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
9
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
12
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
15
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
17
Bioconjugate Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
21
BMC Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
22
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%