Synergistic effects of combing proton- or X-irradiation with anti-PDL1 immunotherapy in two murine oral cancers
Rykkelid, A. M.; Sinha, P. M.; Folefac, C. A.; Horsman, M. R.; Sorensen, B. S.; Soland, T. M.; Schreurs, O. J. F.; Malinen, E.; Edin, N. F. J.
Show abstract
Background and purposeCombining radiation therapy with immunotherapy may be beneficial in treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC), but the combined effect may depend on tumor characteristics and the type of radiation. The purpose was to compare responses for two syngeneic tumor models in mice following X-ray or proton irradiation with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Materials and methodsMOC1 and MOC2 tumors were inoculated in the right hind leg of each mouse (C57BL/6J, n=159). Single-dose irradiation with X-rays or protons and administration of anti-PDL1 started when the tumors reached 200 mm3. Doses of 5-30 Gy were given. Time-dependent tumor volume data were analyzed with a regression model yielding the growth rate {gamma} without irradiation and the reduction in growth rate per dose {eta}. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was calculated as the ratio of {eta} for X-rays to that of protons. Synergy between radiation and ICI was estimated as the ratio of {eta}s. ResultsMOC2 tumors grew faster and were more radioresistant than MOC1 tumors. ICI reduced the growth rate for MOC1 with 20{+/-}2% compared to controls, while no reduction was seen for MOC2. RBE for MOC1 wo/w ICI was 0.89{+/-}0.04 and 0.93{+/-}0.06, respectively, while it was 1.15{+/-}0.12 and 1.60{+/-}0.17, respectively, for MOC2. Combination synergy for X-rays was 1.22{+/-}0.08 and 0.96{+/-}0.11 in MOC1 and MOC2, respectively, while was it 1.27{+/-}0.06 and 1.33 {+/-}0.13, respectively, for protons. ConclusionsRBE for protons was dependent on use of ICI and tumor type. A greater synergy may be achieved when combining protons with ICI compared to X-rays and ICI.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of indirect damage and damage saturation effects in dose-response curves of hypofractionated radiotherapy of early-stage NSCLC and brain metastases 96%
- Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams 96%
- Serum miRNA-based signature indicates radiation exposure and dose in humans: a multicenter diagnostic biomarker study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- FLASH Radiotherapy Mitigates Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia and Prevents Immunosuppression via Chk1-STAT3 Axis Modulation in a Preclinical Thoracic Irradiation Model 96%
- Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) prediction model for osteoradionecrosis of the mandible in head and neck cancer patients following radiotherapy: Large-scale observational cohort 96%
- Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of FLASH vs conventional dose rate radiotherapy in a model of orthotopic, murine breast cancer 96%
- Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes following proton therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review 96%
- Standardising Breast Radiotherapy Structure Naming Conventions: A Machine Learning Approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive factors for the development of peritumoral brain edema after LINAC-based radiation treatment in patients with intracranial meningioma 96%
- Ilomastat contributes to the survival of mouse after irradiation via promoting the recovery of hematopoietic system 95%
- Curability Difference between Autochthonous Mouse Tumors and Their Transplants in Association with Immune Gene Expression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modulating the unfolded protein response: Impacts of radiation on the response of prostate cancer cells to ONC201 96%
- Genome-wide transcriptomic response of whole blood to radiation 95%
- Intermittent radiotherapy as alternative treatment for recurrent high grade glioma: A modelling study based on longitudinal tumor measurements 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.