Back

Cost And Utilization Trends Of Endomyocardial Biopsy In Heart Transplant Patients: A 4-Year Claims Data Analysis

Vilalta, A.

2023-09-13 transplantation
10.1101/2023.09.13.23295491 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study evaluated patterns of utilization, complications, and costs of endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) in heart transplant patients. MethodsThe IBM(R) Treatment Pathways(R) tool was used to analyze claims data selected from the IBM(R)s MarketScan(R) de-identified, HIPAA-compliant dataset. Differences in EMB paid amounts and utilization patterns were assessed for commercial payers and Medicare for years 2016 to 2019. Type, frequency, and overall cost of complications of the EMB procedure in these patients were also evaluated. ResultsA total of 8,170 records (6,385 commercial payers and 1,785 Medicare) of heart transplant patients with evidence of EMB procedures performed between 2016 and 2019 were identified in the database. In 2019, the median paid amount for an outpatient EMB in a heart transplant patient was US $7,918 (commercial) and US $2,980 (Medicare). Heart transplant patients received between 4.6 and 6.8 (median; Medicare, commercial) EMBs the first year after the transplant. Approximately 25% of EMB procedures were associated with complications. In 2019 the total cost of EMB complications per patient was US $9,049. DiscussionAnalysis showed that the paid amount for the EMB procedure increased by almost 25% from 2016 to 2019 for commercial payers. Given the high frequency of complications after the EMB procedure and the associated cost of the complications it is estimated that the median paid amounts are closer to US $10,000 per patient per EMB. Given the number of EMBs provided, the associated risks, and the paid amount trends, non-invasive alternatives to EMB should be considered for the surveillance of heart transplant patients.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.