Validation of Real-World Case Definitions for COVID-19 Diagnosis and Severe COVID-19 Illness Among Patients Infected with SARS-CoV-2: Translation of Clinical Trial Definitions to Real-World Settings
Duh, M. S.; Nguyen, C.; Rubino, H.; Herrick, C.; Chang, R.; DerSarkissian, M.; Hsieh, Y. G.; Banatwala, A.; Yu, L. H.; Belsky, G.; Murphy, M. E.; Boyle-Kelly, J.; Cagan, A.; Stangle, B. E.; Cremieux, P. Y.; Kolitsopoulos, F.; Murphy, S. N.
Show abstract
PurposeThis study assessed the performance of International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnostic code U07.1 against polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results (Objective 1), and electronic medical record (EMR)-based codified algorithm for severe COVID-19 illness based on endpoints used in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine trial against chart review (Objective 2). MethodsThis retrospective, longitudinal cohort study used EMR data from the Mass General Brigham COVID-19 Data Mart (3/1/2020-11/19/2020) for adult patients with [≥]1 PCR test, antigen test, or code U07.1 (Objective 1) and adult patients with a positive PCR test hospitalized with COVID-19 (Objective 2). ResultsAmong 354,124 patients in Objective 1, 96% had [≥]1 PCR test (including 6% with [≥]1 positive PCR test; 11% with [≥]1 code U07.1). Code U07.1 had low sensitivity (54%) and positive predictive value (PPV; 63%) but high specificity (97%) against the PCR test. Among 300 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 randomly sampled for chart review in Objective 2, the EMR-based case definition for severe COVID-19 illness had high PPV (>95%), showing better performance than severe/critical COVID-19 endpoints defined by the World Health Organization (PPV: 79%). ConclusionsCOVID-19 diagnosis based on ICD-10-CM code U07.1 had inadequate sensitivity and requires confirmation by PCR testing. The EMR-based case definition showed high PPV and can be used to identify cases of severe COVID-19 illness in real-world datasets. These findings highlight the importance of validating outcomes in real-world data, and can guide researchers analyzing COVID-19 data when PCR tests are not readily available. KEY POINTSO_LIThis study evaluated the performance of International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes and an electronic medical record (EMR)-based algorithm for identifying coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis and severe COVID-19 illness in real-world data. C_LIO_LIICD-10-CM code U07.1 for COVID-19 had low sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) against PCR tests. C_LIO_LIThe EMR-based algorithm for severe COVID-19 illness developed from the Pfizer- BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine trial had high PPV against chart review, and may be used to identify severe cases in real-world data. C_LIO_LIThese results highlight the importance of validating outcomes when conducting analyses of real-world datasets. C_LI PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYAs polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis are becoming less frequently used and there is no standard definition of severe COVID-19 illness, it is important to have a way of correctly identifying COVID-19 diagnosis or severe COVID-19 illness in real-world data (e.g., electronic medical records [EMRs]). This study examined: 1) how a diagnosis code for COVID-19 used in EMRs (i.e., U07.1) compares to PCR test results in terms of accurately identifying patients with COVID-19; and 2) whether a definition for severe COVID-19 illness developed based on the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine trial and a definition used by the World Health Organization [WHO]) can be used to accurately identify patients with severe COVID-19 illness in EMRs. The results showed that code U07.1 was not very accurate in identifying patients with COVID-19. On the other hand, the developed definition for severe COVID-19 illness was more accurate than the WHO definition and was able to identify most patients with severe COVID-19 illness in real-world data.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of the 2023-2024 Omicron XBB.1.5-containing mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273.815) in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalizations and medical encounters among adults in the United States: An interim analysis 95%
- Clinical symptoms among ambulatory patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Reduction in risk of death among patients admitted with COVID-19 between first and second epidemic waves in New York City 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics and Factors Associated with COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Mortality Across Race and Ethnicity 94%
- Population-based estimates of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) prevalence and characteristics: A cross-sectional study 94%
- Interim Analysis of Risk Factors for Severe Outcomes among a Cohort of Hospitalized Adults Identified through the U.S. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Trends Among U.S. Adults Hospitalized with COVID-19, March-December 2020 94%
- Anti-nucleocapsid antibodies following SARS-CoV-2 infection in the blinded phase of the mRNA-1273 Covid-19 vaccine efficacy clinical trial 93%
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 treatment with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir among U.S. Veterans: target trial emulation studies with one-month and six-month outcomes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.