Back

Prevalence of Long COVID-associated symptoms in adults with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection in Germany: Results of the population-based study: Corona Monitoring Nationwide 2021/22 (RKI-SOEP-2)

Poethko-Mueller, C.; Ordonez-Cruickshank, A.; Nuebel, J.; Sarganas, G.; Goesswald, A.; Schmid, L.; Schaffrath Rosario, A.; Hoebel, J.; Schlaud, M.; Scheidt-Nave, C.

2023-09-12 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.09.12.23295426 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundControlled population-based studies on long-term health sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 can help to identify clinical signs specific to "Long COVID" and to evaluate this emerging public health challenge. AimTo examine prevalence differences of Long COVID-associated symptoms among adults with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection in Germany. MethodsThis population-based, retrospective study (11/2021-2/2022) included 7,683 working aged adults (18-65 years), a subset of the Corona Monitoring Nationwide study in Germany. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined based on self-reported PCR-confirmed infections and IgG-antibody dried blood spot testing. Participants answered a questionnaire including 19 common symptoms of Long COVID experienced in the six months preceding the survey. We estimated population-weighted prevalence of (1) individual symptoms, and (2) [&ge;]1 symptom, with and without impact on work ability, by infection status within strata of sex, age group, income and comorbidity. We calculated model-adjusted prevalence differences and the probability that symptoms among infected are attributable to infection. Results12 of 19 symptoms showed a significantly higher prevalence in infected than non-infected participants, including fatigue (27.5% versus 18.3%; p<0.001), concentration problems (22.2% vs. 13.1%; p<0.001), shortness of breath (15.6% vs. 7.5%; p<0.001), and smell and taste disorder (10% vs. 1.2%; p<0.001). [&ge;]1 symptom with impact on work ability was more prevalent following infection (16.0% vs. 12.2%; p=0.06) with a model-adjusted prevalence difference of 3.8% (95%-CI -0.5-8.0). ConclusionWe observed a rather small excess prevalence attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the absolute number of persons places great demands on the health care system and may affect economic productivity.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
2
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
3
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.5%
5
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
8
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
13
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
22
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
24
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
25
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%