Back

Propofol for treatment-resistant depression: A randomized controlled trial

Tadler, S. C.; Jones, K. G.; Lybbert, C.; Huang, J. C.; Jawish, R.; Solzbacher, D.; Kendrick, E. J.; Pierson, M. D.; Weischedel, K.; Rana, N.; Jacobs, R.; Vonesh, L. C.; Feldman, D. A.; Larson, C.; Hoffman, N.; Jessop, J. E.; Larson, A. L.; Taylor, N. E.; Odell, D. H.; Kuck, K.; Mickey, B. J.

2023-09-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.09.12.23294678
Show abstract

BackgroundAnesthetic agents including ketamine and nitrous oxide have shown antidepressant properties when appropriately dosed. Our recent open-label trial of propofol, an intravenous anesthetic known to elicit transient positive mood effects, suggested that it may also produce robust and durable antidepressant effects when administered at a high dose that elicits an electroencephalographic (EEG) burst-suppression state. Here we report findings from a randomized controlled trial (NCT03684447) that compared two doses of propofol. We hypothesized greater improvement with a high dose that evoked burst suppression versus a low dose that did not. MethodsParticipants with moderate-to-severe, treatment-resistant depression were randomized to a series of 6 treatments at low versus high dose (n=12 per group). Propofol infusions were guided by real-time processed frontal EEG to achieve predetermined pharmacodynamic criteria. The primary and secondary depression outcome measures were the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), respectively. Secondary scales measured suicidal ideation, anxiety, functional impairment, and quality of life. ResultsTreatments were well tolerated and blinding procedures were effective. The mean [95%-CI] change in HDRS-24 score was -5.3 [-10.3, -0.2] for the low-dose group and -9.3 [-12.9, -5.6] for the high-dose group (17% versus 33% reduction). The between-group effect size (standardized mean difference) was -0.56 [-1.39, 0.28]. The group difference was not statistically significant (p=0.24, linear model). The mean change in PHQ-9 score was -2.0 [-3.9, -0.1] for the low dose and -4.8 [-7.7, -2.0] for the high dose. The between-group effect size was -0.73 [-1.59, 0.14] (p=0.09). Secondary outcomes favored the high dose (effect sizes magnitudes 0.1 - 0.9) but did not generally reach statistical significance (p>0.05). ConclusionsThe medium-sized effects observed between doses in this small, controlled, clinical trial suggest that propofol may have dose-dependent antidepressant effects. The findings also provide guidance for subsequent trials. A larger sample size and additional treatments in series are likely to enhance the ability to detect dose-dependent effects. Future work is warranted to investigate potential antidepressant mechanisms and dose optimization.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 35%
13.6%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 0.9%
11.5%
3
European Neuropsychopharmacology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Psychiatry Research
based on 33 papers
Top 0.9%
5.4%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 49%
3.0%
6
Neuropsychopharmacology
based on 29 papers
Top 0.8%
3.0%
7
Molecular Psychiatry
based on 84 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
8
Journal of Psychiatric Research
based on 22 papers
Top 0.5%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
based on 56 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
11
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
13
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
based on 23 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
based on 27 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 6%
1.6%
16
Biological Psychiatry
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
17
BMJ Mental Health
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
19
JAMA Psychiatry
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 13%
1.4%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 13%
1.2%
22
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 17%
1.2%
23
BMC Psychiatry
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
24
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 50%
0.8%
25
Brain and Behavior
based on 19 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Brain Stimulation
based on 27 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
27
BJPsych Open
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Pain
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Schizophrenia
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.7%