Multimodal mental health assessment with remote interviews using facial, vocal, linguistic, and cardiovascular patterns
Jiang, Z.; Seyedi, S.; Griner, E. L.; Abbasi, A.; Bahrami Rad, A.; Kwon, H.; Cotes, R. O.; Clifford, G. D.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe current clinical practice of psychiatric evaluation suffers from subjectivity and bias, and requires highly skilled professionals that are often unavailable or unaffordable. Objective digital biomarkers have shown the potential to address these issues. In this work, we investigated whether behavioral and physiological signals, extracted from remote interviews, provided complimentary information for assessing psychiatric disorders. MethodsTime series of multimodal features were derived from four conceptual modes: facial expression, vocal expression, linguistic expression, and cardiovascular modulation. The features were extracted from simultaneously recorded audio and video of remote interviews using task-specific and foundation models. Averages, standard deviations, and hidden Markov model-derived statistics of these features were computed from 73 subjects. Four binary classification tasks were defined: detecting 1) any clinically-diagnosed psychiatric disorder, 2) major depressive disorder, 3) self-rated depression, and 4) self-rated anxiety. Each modality was evaluated individually and in combination. ResultsStatistically significant feature differences were found between controls and subjects with mental health conditions. Correlations were found between features and self-rated depression and anxiety scores. Visual heart rate dynamics achieved the best unimodal performance with areas under the receiver-operator curve (AUROCs) of 0.68-0.75 (depending on the classification task). Combining multiple modalities achieved AUROCs of 0.72-0.82. Features from task-specific models outperformed features from foundation models. ConclusionMultimodal features extracted from remote interviews revealed informative characteristics of clinically diagnosed and self-rated mental health status. SignificanceThe proposed multimodal approach has the potential to facilitate objective, remote, and low-cost assessment for low-burden automated mental health services.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Off-body Sleep Analysis for Predicting Adverse Behavior in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder 92%
- Time-adaptive Unsupervised Auditory Attention Decoding Using EEG-based Stimulus Reconstruction 92%
- Hyperbolic graph embedding of MEG brain networks to study brain alterations in individuals with subjective cognitive decline 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of medical device software for the screening and assessment of depression severity using data collected from a wristband-type wearable device: SWIFT study protocol 94%
- Bridging Structural MRI with Cognitive Function for Individual Level Classification of Early Psychosis via Deep Learning 93%
- Understanding Psychiatric Illness Through Natural Language Processing (UNDERPIN): Rationale, Design, and Methodology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of Visual and Auditory Digital Markers of Suicidality in Acutely Suicidal Psychiatric In-Patients 94%
- Uncovering social states in healthy and clinical populations using digital phenotyping and Hidden Markov Models 91%
- Accurately Differentiating COVID-19, Other Viral Infection, and Healthy Individuals Using Multimodal Features via Late Fusion Learning 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.