Gastric Alimetry testing and healthcare economic analysis in nausea and vomiting syndromes
Xu, W.; Williams, L.; Serebatnam, G.; Varghese, C.; Cedarwall, C.; Daker, C.; Keane, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundChronic nausea and vomiting syndromes (CNVS), gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia (FD) are complex disorders. Body Surface Gastric Mapping (BSGM), a new test of gastric function, using Gastric Alimetry(Alimetry, New Zealand) may be useful for de-escalating healthcare utilisation. This study aimed to define healthcare costs and estimate health economic impacts of implementing this test in patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms. MethodsConsecutive patients at a tertiary referral centre evaluated with Gastric Alimetry were included. Frequency and cost data relating to medical investigations, hospital, and outpatient presentations were evaluated. Costs of healthcare utilisation were calculated, and the potential cost savings of implementing Gastric Alimetry within a diagnostic decision-tree model were estimated. ResultsOverall, 31 consecutive patients (mean age 36.1 years; 83.9% female; predominant symptoms: nausea [83.9%], pain [61.3%], vomiting [67.7%], bloating [35.5%]) completed Gastric Alimetry testing. Repeat gastroscopy and abdominal CT rates were 29% (8/28) and 85% (11/13) respectively. Gastric Alimetry testing identified spectral abnormalities in 45.2% of patients, and symptom profiling classified a further 29.1% of patients. Median annualised cost difference after test introduction was NZ$-12,032. Estimated reductions in investigation-related costs when incorporating Gastric Alimetry into the diagnostic workflow model were approximately NZ$1,500 per patient. ConclusionsHealthcare utilisation and confirmatory testing rates remain high in nausea and vomiting syndromes. This study presents real-world data, together with a decision tree analysis, showing Gastric Alimetry can streamline clinical care pathways, resulting in reduced healthcare utilisation and cost.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 95%
- Nonendoscopic Detection Of Barrett’S Esophagus In Patients Without Gerd Symptoms 94%
- Normative values for body surface gastric mapping evaluations of gastric motility using Gastric Alimetry: spectral analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct subgroups in gastroparesis defined by simultaneous body surface gastric mapping and gastric emptying breath testing 95%
- Predicting symptomatic response to prokinetic treatment using Gastric Alimetry 95%
- Clinical Associations of Functional Dyspepsia with Gastric Dysrhythmia on Electrogastrography: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sphincterotomy for Biliary Sphincter of Oddi Disorder and idiopathic Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis: THE RESPOND LONGITUDINAL COHORT 94%
- Gastrointestinal symptoms as Covid-19 onset in hospitalized Italian patients 94%
- Multi-centre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web-tool 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and Safety of Tradipitant in Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. 93%
- Clonal transitions and phenotypic evolution in Barrett esophagus 89%
- Reduced expression of COVID-19 host receptor, ACE2 is associated with small bowel inflammation, more severe disease, and response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 91%
- An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: significantly more complicated appendicitis due to delayed presentation of patients! 90%
- Effects of a spore-forming probiotic blend on bowel habits and physical well-being in adults with functional constipation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.