Exploring the creation or adaptation of knowledge mobilization products for culturally and linguistically diverse audiences: a scoping review
Elliott, S. A.; Scott, S.; Bialy, L.; Wright, K.; Hartling, L.
Show abstract
IntroductionConnecting end-users to research evidence has the power to improve patient knowledge and inform health decision-making. However, recognized barriers to or determinants of effective knowledge mobilization (KMb) are differences in culture and language among the end users of the evidence. This scoping review set out to understand current processes and practices when creating or adapting KMb products for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) audiences. MethodsWe searched 3 databases (Ovid Medline, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, PsychINFO) from 2011 until August 2021. We included any literature about KMb product creation or adaptation processes serving CALD communities. A primary reviewer screened all identified publications and a second reviewer screened publications excluded by the primary. Data were extracted using a standardized form by one reviewer and 10% were verified by a second reviewer. Studies were categorized by type of adaptation ( surface or deep structure) and mapped based on type of stakeholder engagement used (i2S model). A search update was run in July 2023, and screening and extraction are in progress. ResultsSeven thousand four hundred and five unique titles and abstracts were reviewed, 319 full-text studies were retrieved and reviewed, and 24 studies were included in final data extraction and mapping. Fifteen studies (63%) created or adapted exclusively text-based KMb products such as leaflets and pamphlets and 9 (38%) produced digital products such as videos (n=4, 16%), mobile applications (n=3, 13%), website (n=1, 4%) and a CD ROM (n=1, 4%). Eight studies (33%) reported following a framework or theory for their creation or adaptation efforts. Only five studies (21%) demonstrated deep structure cultural sensitivity and applied all five (Inform, Consult, Involve, Collaborate, and Support) levels of stakeholder engagement. Four (17%) studies included reflections from the research teams on the processes for creating or adapting KMb products for CALD communities. ConclusionIncluded studies cited a variety of methods in creating or adapting KMb products for CALD communities. Successful uptake of created or adapted KMb products was often the result of collaboration with end-users for more applicable, accessible and meaningful products. Further research developing guidance and best practices is needed to support the creation or adaptation of KMb products with CALD communities.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 95%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 94%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 93%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 94%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 92%
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
- An electronic application to improve management of infections in low-income neonatal units: pilot implementation of the NeoTree Beta App in a public sector hospital in Zimbabwe. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 97%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 94%
- Contextual factors influencing implementation of tuberculosis digital adherence technologies: a scoping review guided by the RE-AIM framework 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.