CATHI: An interactive platform for comparative genomics and homolog identification
Becker, L.; Spohr, P.; Klau, G. W.; Axmann, I. M.; Fraune, S.; Schmelling, N. M.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWBioinformatics has established itself as a central pillar of modern biology. Specifically, comparative genomics enables scientists to study a vast number of genomes efficiently. These comparative analyses shed light on the evolution and potential function of genomes and genes, but are also increasingly used as a key tool for metabolic engineering and synthetic biology by identifying appropriate targets for modification. While numerous sophisticated tools for comparative genomics and homolog identification exist, those tools predominantly target highly skilled bioinformatics users. Consequently, many biologists either defer such analyses to their more versed bioinformatic collaborators or resort to suboptimal tools. Here, we present an intuitive solution available on all major operating systems, easily accessed through common web browsers. CATHI - Comparative Analysis Tool for Homolog Identification - integrates a suite of best-practice bioinformatic tools, encompassing BLAST for homology searches, MAFFT for multiple sequence alignment, FastTree2 for phylogeny reconstruction, and clinker for synteny analysis. Specifically tailored to biologists, CATHI orchestrates predefined settings and automated pipelines, obviating the need for programming expertise. This platform empowers researchers to confidently engage in detailed comparative genomics studies by streamlining the analytical process. The interactive framework provides users with a plethora of options. This includes real-time execution and progress monitoring, facilitates dynamic result tracking, and a set of search functions across NCBI databases like CDD or ProtFam. Users can interactively engage in data exploration, filtering, and visualization through CATHIs intuitive interface. Furthermore, the seamless export of project data in standard formats (FASTA, Newick, CSV, and HTML) facilitates the integration with further third-party tools such as TreeViewer and Jalview. To benchmark CATHI, we revisited the comparative analysis of cyanobacterial circadian clock proteins conducted by Schmelling et al. in 2017, revealing consistent global patterns among identified homologs, while also highlighting individual variations attributed to the expansion of available databases.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.