Back

Gender and Socio-Economic Status as moderators in the associations between Social Support Sources and Adolescents' Mental and Behavioral Health Indicators

Bermejo-Martins, E.; Torres-Sahli, M.; Madsen, K. R.; Tabs-Damgraads, M.; Nielsen, L.; Meilstrup, C. B.; Toftager, M.; Santini, Z. I.

2023-09-02 public and global health
10.1101/2023.08.31.23294835 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundExtensive research has established the intricate links between diverse social support sources and vital adolescent health indicators, such as mental wellbeing (MWB), problematic social media use (PSMU), and physical activity (PA). However, existing studies have not explored these interrelationships within a unified model or examined the moderating effects of gender and socio-economic status (SES). MethodsThis cross-sectional study employed a representative Danish sample of 2.034 adolescents, aged 13 and 15 years. A Multi-group Structural Equation Model (SEM) and covariance-based comparisons analysis utilized items from Multidimensional Scales of Perceived Social Support, The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, Social Media Disorder Scale, and measures of PA duration and frequency. ResultsThe associations between MWB-Teacher Support and MWB-Classmate Support were stronger in low SES adolescents than those with mid-high SES. Notably, the PSMU-Family Support negative association was more pronounced among girls, while PSMU-Friend Supports negative relationship was stronger among boys. The PA-Family Support positive relationship was more robust in boys, while the PA-Teacher Support positive association was stronger among low-mid SES adolescents than those in high SES. The positive correlation between PA and MWB was stronger among boys and mid-low SES adolescents. ConclusionsStrategies designed to enhance family and school support, considering gender and SES, could effectively promote MWB and deter behavioural issues like PSMU and sedentary behaviours in adolescents.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.7%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.5%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
4
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
9
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%