Pilot Clinical Validation of a Machine Learning Platform for Noninvasive Smartphone-Based Assessment of Corneal Epithelial Integrity
Zhang, A.; Pratap, J. S.; Young, J. R.; Lui, J.; Attari, K.; Srivastava, A. A.; Wu, E. R.; Moreno, A. D.; Miall, A.; Iyer, J. M.; Mantena, S.; Chandra, J.; Joshi, V. P.; Jacobs, D. S.
Show abstract
PurposeFluorescein staining (FS) is a standard method of assessing corneal epithelium (CE) integrity. However, the equipment and personnel required for FS may be unavailable in low-resource environments. We developed and validated a low-cost, noninvasive, and quantitative CE evaluation pipeline using a custom smartphone attachment and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). MethodsA 3D-printed smartphone attachment and placido disk illumination module was attached to a OnePlus 7 Pro smartphone. 26 smartphone-acquired images were obtained from 15 subjects, comprising a dataset including healthy eyes and corneal epitheliopathies of Oxford grade I-V. A classifier CNN was trained on 8 subjects (23,173 image patches) to identify areas of suspected epithelial disruption, and validated on 7 subjects (10,883 image patches). The fraction of disrupted corneal surface area (FDSA) was computed for each subject from the model output. Results were compared with FS slit lamp photos which were independently graded by two clinicians using the Oxford scheme. ResultsFDSA showed promise as a non-invasive marker of CE integrity, with mean FDSA in the Oxford >II cohort being higher than the Oxford [≤]II cohort (p = 0.04 and p = 0.09 using Oxford scores from each clinician, respectively). Additionally, areas of CE disruption identified by our smartphone-based technique showed qualitative concordance with those revealed by FS. ConclusionsOur technique for smartphone-based CE imaging and automated analysis is a promising low-cost, noninvasive method to quantitatively evaluate the CE. Translational RelevanceThis tool can be used to evaluate ocular surface disease in low-resource regions.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Low-cost, Smartphone-based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium 97%
- Automatic Measurements of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements by Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection 95%
- Current applications of artificial intelligence for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a systematic review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 94%
- AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas 94%
- Evaluation of the Nallasamy Formula: A Stacking Ensemble Machine Learning Method for Refraction Prediction in Cataract Surgery 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.