Accuracy and Correlation Between Bed Scale and Standing Scale Weights in Monitoring Volume Status in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Skoll, D.; Abarca, P.; Pham, V.; Das, A.; Mantini, C.; Tun, H.; Van Herle, H.; Vaidya, A.; Wolfson, A.; Fong, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate monitoring of volume status is vital in managing diuretic therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Guidelines recommend daily measurement of standing body weight as an indicator of volume status, though many healthcare facilities use bed scales instead. There is limited data surrounding the accuracy of bed scales compared to standing scales, and literature suggests discrepancy between the two. This study is the first to evaluate the accuracy and correlation between scales among patients hospitalized for ADHF. MethodsAdults (age [≥]18) diagnosed with ADHF and its derivatives who were hospitalized at our center between March and April 2023 were identified via electronic medical record. Patients were included if they demonstrated capacity to consent and were medically cleared to ambulate independently. Participants weights were measured via bed scale and standing scale at the same time on each day of data collection. The mean difference (bias), precision [standard deviation (SD)], and limits of agreement ({+/-}2 SD) were calculated and graphed using the Bland-Altman method. Based on expert opinion, a bias of greater than {+/-} 0.6 kg and precision greater than {+/-} 3.0 kg were considered clinically significant. Results51 pairs of bed and standing scale weights were obtained among 43 patients. The mean difference {+/-} precision between weights was 1.42 {+/-} 1.18 kg (95% CI, -0.894 - 3.73), exceeding the recommended bias. In addition, 71% (n=36) of participants weights differed by more than 0.6 kg between the bed and standing scale, 22% (n=11) differed by more than 2.0 kg, and 5.9% (n=3) differed by more than 4.0 kg (see Table I). O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b2ee2dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@132dc19org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10296borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10f600borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6aaf3e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL O_FLOATNOTable I.C_FLOATNO O_TABLECAPTIONWeights for Study Participants C_TABLECAPTION C_TBL ConclusionsBed scales are not accurate compared to standing scales and may lead to errors in fluid management in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. What is KnownO_LIAdequate diuresis and volume status optimization are mainstays of therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure C_LIO_LIGuidelines recommend measurement of standing body weight as an indicator of volume status, though many hospitals use bed scales instead C_LI What the Study AddsO_LIThis is the first study to assess the difference in weights between bed and standing scales in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure C_LIO_LIThis study provides evidence that bed scale weights are not accurate compared to standing scale weights in this population C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating remote monitoring into heart failure patients’ care regimen: A pilot study 94%
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 94%
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 93%
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 92%
- Effectiveness of An Impedance Cardiography Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control in A Real-World Setting: Results from A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study 95%
- Socioeconomic and comorbid factors affecting mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 92%
- Comparison of in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes among patients greater than and less than 80 years undergoing TAVR 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 93%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 93%
- The Diagnostic Accuracy of Subjective Dyspnea in Detecting Hypoxemia Among Outpatients with COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acute Peritoneal Dialysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic at Bellevue Hospital in New York City 91%
- Association of Obesity with Kidney Function Outcomes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction 90%
- Biopsychosocial correlates of somatic symptom burden in chronic kidney disease: results of the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS) 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.