Back

RCT-based Social Return on Investment (SROI) of a home exercise programme for people with early dementia comparing in-person and blended delivery before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Doungsong, K.; Hartfiel, N.; Gladman, J.; Harwood, R. H.; Edwards, R. T.

2023-08-25 health economics
10.1101/2023.08.25.23294408 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRegular exercise and community engagement may slow the rate of function loss for people with dementia. However, the evidence is uncertain regarding the cost-effectiveness and social return on investment (SROI) of home exercise with community referral for people with dementia. This study aimed to compare the social value generated from the in-person PrAISED programme delivered before March 2020 with a blended PrAISED programme delivered after March 2020. MethodsSROI analysis was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Of 205 patient participants and their carers who completed cost data, 61 completed an in-person programme before March 2020. Due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, 144 patient participants completed a blended programme consisting of a combination of in-person visits, phone calls and video conferencing with multidisciplinary team (MDT) members. SROI analysis compared in-person and blended delivery formats. Five relevant and material outcomes were identified: three outcomes for patient participants (fear of falling, health-related quality of life, and social connection); one outcome for carer participants (carer strain index), and one outcome for the NHS (health service resource use). Data were collected at baseline and a 12-month follow-up. ResultsThe in-person PrAISED programme generated SROI ratios ranging from {pound}0.58 to {pound}2.33 for every {pound}1 invested. In-person PrAISED patient participants gained social value from improved health-related quality of life, social connection, and less fear of falling. In-person PrAISED carer participants acquired social value from less carer strain. The NHS gained benefit from less health care service resource use. However, the blended PrAISED programme generated lower SROI ratios ranging from a negative ratio to {pound}0.08: {pound}1. ConclusionCompared with the blended programme, the PrAISED in-person programme generated higher SROI ratios for people with early dementia. During the COVID-19 pandemic and its restrictions, a blended delivery of the programme and the curtailment of community activities resulted in lower SROI ratios during this period. An in-person PrAISED intervention with community referral is likely to provide better value for money than a blended one with limited community referral, despite the greater costs of the former. Trial registrationISRCTN15320670

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.2%
3
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
24
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%