Back

Unveiling the Robustness of Machine Learning Models in Classifying COVID-19 Spike Sequences

Ali, S.; Chen, P.-Y.; Patterson, M.

2023-08-24 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.08.24.554651 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the midst of the global COVID-19 pandemic, a wealth of data has become available to researchers, presenting a unique opportunity to investigate the behavior of the virus. This research aims to facilitate the design of efficient vaccinations and proactive measures to prevent future pandemics through the utilization of machine learning (ML) models for decision-making processes. Consequently, ensuring the reliability of ML predictions in these critical and rapidly evolving scenarios is of utmost importance. Notably, studies focusing on the genomic sequences of individuals infected with the coronavirus have revealed that the majority of variations occur within a specific region known as the spike (or S) protein. Previous research has explored the analysis of spike proteins using various ML techniques, including classification and clustering of variants. However, it is imperative to acknowledge the possibility of errors in spike proteins, which could lead to misleading outcomes and misguide decision-making authorities. Hence, a comprehensive examination of the robustness of ML and deep learning models in classifying spike sequences is essential. In this paper, we propose a framework for evaluating and benchmarking the robustness of diverse ML methods in spike sequence classification. Through extensive evaluation of a wide range of ML algorithms, ranging from classical methods like naive Bayes and logistic regression to advanced approaches such as deep neural networks, our research demonstrates that utilizing k-mers for creating the feature vector representation of spike proteins is more effective than traditional one-hot encoding-based embedding methods. Additionally, our findings indicate that deep neural networks exhibit superior accuracy and robustness compared to non-deep-learning baselines. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to benchmark the accuracy and robustness of machine-learning classification models against various types of random corruptions in COVID-19 spike protein sequences. The benchmarking framework established in this research holds the potential to assist future researchers in gaining a deeper understanding of the behavior of the coronavirus, enabling the implementation of proactive measures and the prevention of similar pandemics in the future.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.9%
3
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.9%
4
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
5
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
9
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%