Back

Personalized Machine Learning using Passive Sensing and Ecological Momentary Assessments for Meth Users in Hawaii: A Research Protocol

Washington, P.

2023-08-25 health informatics
10.1101/2023.08.24.23294587 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI)-powered digital therapies which detect meth cravings delivered on consumer devices have the potential to reduce these disparities by providing remote and accessible care solutions to Native Hawaiians, Filipinos, and Pacific Islanders (NHFPI) communities with limited care solutions. However, NHFPI are fully understudied with respect to digital therapeutics and AI health sensing despite using technology at the same rates as other races. ObjectiveWe seek to fulfill two research aims: (1) Understand the feasibility of continuous remote digital monitoring and ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) in NHFPI in Hawaii by curating a novel dataset of longitudinal FitBit biosignals with corresponding craving and substance use labels. (2) Develop personalized AI models which predict meth craving events in real time using wearable sensor data. MethodsWe will develop personalized AI/ML (artificial intelligence/machine learning) models for meth use and craving prediction in 40 NHFPI individuals by curating a novel dataset of real-time FitBit biosensor readings and corresponding participant annotations (i.e., raw self-reported substance use data) of their meth use and cravings. In the process of collecting this dataset, we will glean insights about cultural and other human factors which can challenge the proper acquisition of precise annotations. With the resulting dataset, we will employ self-supervised learning (SSL) AI approaches, which are a new family of ML methods that allow a neural network to be trained without labels by being optimized to make predictions about the data itself. The inputs to the proposed AI models are FitBit biosensor readings and the outputs are predictions of meth use or craving. This paradigm is gaining increased attention in AI for healthcare. ConclusionsWe expect to develop models which significantly outperform traditional supervised methods by fine-tuning to an individual subjects data. Such methods will enable AI solutions which work with the limited data available from NHFPI populations and which are inherently unbiased due to their personalized nature. Such models can support future AI-powered digital therapeutics for substance abuse.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.1%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.0%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
5
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
11
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
14
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%