Back

Gamified Adaptive Approach Bias Modification: a Pilot RCT in Individuals with Methamphetamine Use History

Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, T.; Li, D.; Hao, W.

2023-08-24 addiction medicine
10.1101/2023.08.22.22279466 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDCognitive bias modification (CBM) programs have shown promise in treating psychiatric conditions, but they can be perceived as boring and repetitive. Incorporating gamified designs and adaptive algorithms in CBM training may address this issue and enhance engagement and effectiveness. OBJECTIVETo gather preliminary data and assess the preliminary efficacy of an adaptive approach bias modification (A-ApBM) paradigm in reducing cue-induced craving in individuals with methamphetamine use history. METHODSA randomized controlled trial with three arms was conducted. Individuals aged 18-60 with methamphetamine dependence and at least one year of methamphetamine use were recruited from 12 community-based rehabilitation centers in Sichuan, China. Individuals with inability to fluently operate a smartphone and/or the presence of mental health conditions other than methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) were excluded. A-ApBM group engaged in ApBM training using a smartphone application for four weeks. A-ApBM used an adaptive algorithm to dynamically adjust the difficulty level based on individual performance. Cue-induced craving scores and relapse were assessed using a visual analog scale at baseline, post-intervention, and at week-16 follow-up. RESULTSA total of 136 participants were recruited and randomized: 48 were randomized to the A-ApBM group, 48 were randomized to the S-ApBM group, and 40 were randomized to the no-intervention control group. The A-ApBM group showed a significant reduction in cue-induced craving scores at post-intervention compared to baseline (Cohens d = 0.34, p < 0.01, 95% CI = [0.03,0.54]). The reduction remained significant at the week-16 follow-up (Cohens d = 0.40, p= 0.01, 95% CI = [0.18,0.57]). No significant changes were observed in the S-ApBM and control groups. CONCLUSIONThe adaptive ApBM paradigm with gamified designs and dynamic difficulty adjustments may be an effective intervention for reducing cue-induced craving in individuals with methamphetamine use history. This approach improves engagement and personalization, potentially enhancing the effectiveness of CBM programs. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore the application of adaptive ApBM in other psychiatric conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATIONRegistered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT05794438).

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.5%
2
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
5
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
7
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
8
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
9
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
11
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
13
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
21
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%