Back

Enabling large-scale screening of Barrett's esophagus using weakly supervised deep learning in histopathology

Bouzid, K.; Sharma, H.; Killcoyne, S.; Castro, D. C.; Schwaighofer, A.; Ilse, M.; Salvatelli, V.; Oktay, O.; Murthy, S.; Bordeaux, L.; Moore, L.; O'Donovan, M.; Thieme, A.; Nori, A.; Gehrung, M.; Alvarez-Valle, J.

2023-08-22 gastroenterology
10.1101/2023.08.21.23294360 medRxiv
Show abstract

Timely detection of Barretts esophagus, the pre-malignant condition of esophageal adenocarcinoma, can improve patient survival rates. The Cytosponge-TFF3 test, a non-endoscopic minimally invasive procedure, has been used for diagnosing intestinal metaplasia in Barretts. However, it depends on pathologists assessment of two slides stained with H&E and the immunohistochemical biomarker TFF3. This resource-intensive clinical workflow limits large-scale screening in the at-risk population. Deep learning can improve screening capacity by partly automating Barretts detection, allowing pathologists to prioritize higher risk cases. We propose a deep learning approach for detecting Barretts from routinely stained H&E slides using diagnostic labels, eliminating the need for expensive localized expert annotations. We train and independently validate our approach on two clinical trial datasets, totaling 1,866 patients. We achieve 91.4% and 87.3% AUROCs on discovery and external test datasets for the H&E model, comparable to the TFF3 model. Our proposed semi-automated clinical workflow can reduce pathologists workload to 48% without sacrificing diagnostic performance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.1%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.5%
4
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
6
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.2%
9
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
13
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
29
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%