Back

Influence of functional and phylogenetic dissimilarity on exotic plant invasion depends on spatial scale

Perez-Navarro, M. A.; Clark, A. T.; Brian, J.; Shepherd, H.; Catford, J. A.

2023-08-18 ecology
10.1101/2023.08.18.553820 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIDarwins theory of natural selection provides two seemingly contradictory hypotheses for explaining the success of introduced species: 1) the pre-adaptation hypothesis posits that introduced species that are closely related to native species will be more likely to succeed than distantly related invaders because they already possess relevant characteristics; 2) the limiting-similarity hypothesis posits that invaders that are more similar to resident species will be less likely to succeed due to competitive exclusion. Previous studies assessing this conundrum show mixed results, possibly stemming from variation in study spatial scales and lack of both functional and phylogenetic information. C_LIO_LIWe used species abundances compiled in a 33-year grassland successional survey based at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve (USA) to assess the support for the pre-adaptation and limiting similarity hypotheses at two different spatial scales (neighbourhood scale of 0.5m2, site scale of ~40m2). We combined compositional surveys of 303 vascular plant taxa (256 native, 47 introduced) taken across 2700 plots in a chronosequence of abandonment from agriculture with species functional dissimilarities, phylogenetic distances, environmental covariates and information on species origin. C_LIO_LIOur results consistently supported the pre-adaptation hypothesis at the site scale but diverged at neighbourhood scale, with functional dissimilarity supporting the limiting similarity hypothesis and phylogenetic distance supporting the pre-adaptation hypothesis. Introduced species with low leaf dry matter content (LDMC), low height and high seed mass tended to be most abundant than rest of species, while relationships between species abundance and specific leaf area (SLA) varied with scale. Introduced species were more abundant than natives at higher concentrations of soil N but were less abundant than natives over time. C_LIO_LISynthesis: Our study highlights the importance of environmental filtering on grassland community assembly at the scale of a site - here 40 m2, a spatial resolution that is usually considered "local". This influence of environmental filtering might mask effects of limiting similarity at small "local" scales. Our results demonstrate the importance of accounting for both phylogenetic and functional dissimilarity when examining the complex interaction between species biogeographic origin, functional strategies and evolutionary history as considering one alone can lead to different conclusions. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
6
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.0%
10
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
15
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
21
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
23
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
28
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%