Adjusting for the progressive digitization of health records: working examples on a multi-hospital clinical data warehouse
Remaki, A.; Playe, B.; Bernard, P. J.; Vittoz, S.; Doutreligne, M.; Chatellier, G.; Audureau, E.; Kempf, E.; Porcher, R.; Bey, R.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSObjectivesC_ST_ABSTo propose a new method to account for time-dependent data missingness caused by the increasing digitization of health records in the analysis of large-scale clinical data. Materials and MethodsFollowing a data-driven approach we modeled the progressive adoption of a common electronic health record in 38 hospitals. To this end, we analyzed data collected between 2013 and 2022 and made available in the clinical data warehouse of the Greater Paris University Hospitals. Depending on the category of data, we worked either at the hospital, department or unit level. We evaluated the performance of this model with a retrospective cohort study. We measured the temporal variations of some quality and epidemiological indicators by successively applying two methods, either a naive analysis or a novel complete-source-only analysis that accounts for digitization-induced missingness. ResultsUnrealistic temporal variations of quality and epidemiological indicators were observed when a naive analysis was performed, but this effect was either greatly reduced or disappeared when the complete-source-only method was applied. DiscussionWe demonstrated that a data-driven approach can be used to account for missingness induced by the progressive digitization of health records. This work focused on hospitalization, emergency department and intensive care units records, along with diagnostic codes, discharge prescriptions and consultation reports. Other data categories may require specific modeling of their associated data sources. ConclusionsElectronic health records are constantly evolving and new methods should be developed to debias studies that use these unstable data sources.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- EHR-QC: A streamlined pipeline for automated electronic health records standardisation and preprocessing to predict clinical outcomes 95%
- Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records 93%
- ConceptWAS: a high-throughput method for early identification of COVID-19 presenting symptoms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COHD-COVID: Columbia Open Health Data for COVID-19 Research 94%
- Distinguishing Admissions Specifically for COVID-19 from Incidental SARS-CoV-2 Admissions: A National Retrospective EHR Study 94%
- Structured Codes and Free-Text Notes: Measuring Information Complementarity in Electronic Health Records 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transforming Estonian health data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model: lessons learned 94%
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 93%
- Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can we trust the prediction model? Demonstrating the importance of external validation by investigating the COVID-19 Vulnerability (C-19) Index across an international network of observational healthcare datasets 94%
- Is the quality of hospital EHR data sufficient to evidence its ICHOM outcomes performance in heart failure? A pilot evaluation 94%
- FHIR-DHP: A Standardized Clinical Data Harmonisation Pipeline for scalable AI application deployment 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.