Cohort profile: the "Biomarkers of heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes" study - a prospective cohort study of clinical and metabolic phenotyping of individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes
Mul, D.; Varkevisser, R. D. M.; Aanstoot, H.-J.; Dekker, P.; Birnie, E.; Boersma, E.; Boesten, L. S. M.; Brugts, M. P.; van Dijk, P. R.; Duijvestijn, P. H. L. M.; Dutta, S.; Fransman, C.; Gonera, R.; Hoogenberg, K.; Kooy, A.; Latres, E.; Loves, S.; Nefs, G.; Sas, T.; Verburg, F. A. J.; Vollenbrock, C. E.; Vosjan-Noeverman, M. J.; de Vries-Velraeds, M. M. C.; Veeze, H. J.; Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R.; van der Klauw, M. M.
Show abstract
PurposeThe Biomarkers of heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes study cohort was set up to identify genetic, physiological and psychosocial factors explaining the observed heterogeneity in disease progression and the development of complications in people with long-standing type 1 diabetes (T1D). Data and samples are available for new studies and collaborations. ParticipantsData- and samples were collected in two subsets. 1) A prospective cohort of 611 participants aged [≥]16 years with [≥]5 years T1D duration was recruited from four Dutch Diabetes clinics between June 2016 and March 2021. At baseline and 1- and 2-year follow-up visits, physical assessments were performed, and blood and urine samples were collected. Participants completed questionnaires about diabetes-related problems, quality of life, neuropathy and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia at baseline and at the last follow-up visit. A subgroup of participants underwent mixed-meal tolerance tests (MMTT) at baseline (n=169) and at 1-year follow-up (n=104). Genetic data and linkage to medical and administrative records were also available. 2) A second cross-sectional cohort, aiming to include 200 participants aged [≥]18 years with [≥]35 years T1D duration, was recruited from 7 centres, collecting measurements and samples plus 5-year retrospective data. Findings to dateFasting residual C-peptide secretion associated with decreased risk of impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia. Stimulated residual C-peptide was detectable in an additional 10% of individuals compared with fasting residual C-peptide secretion. MMTT measurements at 90 minutes and 120 minutes showed good concordance with the MMTT total area under the curve. An overall decrease of C-peptide at 1-year follow-up was observed. Future plansResearch groups are invited to consider the use of this data and sample collection. Future work will include additional hormones, beta-cell-directed autoimmunity, specific immune markers, microRNAs, metabolomics and gene expression data, combined with glucometrics, anthropometric/clinical data and additional markers of residual beta-cell function. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_ST_ABSStrengthsC_ST_ABS- The Biomarker cohort is a large longitudinal prospective cohort study with three time points, collecting biosamples and clinical data from participants with well-established and long-standing type 1 diabetes ([≥]5 years). - A subgroup with detailed clinical data underwent MMTT tests at two timepoints allowing further residual beta-cell marker studies. - The Biomarker and Long-Term type 1 Diabetes cohorts represent a "real-world" population, also including participants from non-academic/-specialised centres. Limitations- Despite the fact that data and biosamples were collected from more than 600 participants, this number may be too low for (sub) stratification of the data (e.g. insulin delivery modality, different treating centres and therapies etc.). - In the prospective group there was a relatively high dropout rate of 25% after 2 years, largely affected by the Covid-19 outbreak.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Replication and cross-validation of T2D subtypes based on clinical variables: an IMI-RHAPSODY study 96%
- Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: an overview of the data from the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium 95%
- Circulating metabolites and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study of 11,896 young adults from four Finnish cohorts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Covid-19 fatality prediction in people with diabetes and prediabetes using a simple score at hospital admission 94%
- Treatment outcomes with oral anti-hyperglycaemic therapies in people with diabetes secondary to a pancreatic condition (type 3c diabetes): A population-based cohort study 93%
- Subgroups of adult-onset diabetes: a prospective follow-up study of progression of insulin resistance and deficiency and association with liver steatosis and fibrosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The German Gestational Diabetes Study (PREG): Rationale, Methodology and Design 94%
- A randomised controlled trial of preconception lifestyle intervention on maternal and offspring health in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: study protocol for the BEFORE THE BEGINNING trial 92%
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive validation of fasting- and oral glucose tolerance test-based indices of insulin secretion against gold-standard measures 95%
- Ethnic differences in the manifestation of early-onset type 2 diabetes 95%
- A plasma metabolite score of three eicosanoids predicts incident type 2 diabetes – a prospective study in three independent cohorts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Poor in-utero growth, reduced beta cell secretion and high plasma glucose in childhood are harbingers of glucose intolerance in young Indians 94%
- Relation of incident Type 1 diabetes to recent COVID-19 infection: cohort study using e-health record linkage in Scotland 93%
- Early metabolic features of genetic liability to type 2 diabetes: cohort study with repeated metabolomics across early life 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.