Back

Unique episymbiotic relationship between Gracilibacteria and Zoogloea in activated sludge flocs in a municipal wastewater treatment plant

Fujii, N.; Kuroda, K.; Narihiro, T.; Aoi, Y.; Ozaki, N.; Ohashi, A.; Kindaichi, T.

2023-08-17 microbiology
10.1101/2023.08.16.553637 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Among the various bacteria present in activated sludge, uncultivated Patescibacteria (also known as the Candidate Phyla Radiation/CPR superphylum) are ubiquitous at the class or phylum level. Patescibacteria have a highly restricted metabolic capacity and are thought to be episymbiotic/endosymbiotic or predatory. However, only a limited number of Patescibacteria and their hosts have been identified. Therefore, many Patescibacteria have not been (co-)cultured and identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or electron microscopy. Little is known about the morphology, metabolic potential, and hosts of Gracilibacteria (formerly GN02 or BD1-5) which belong to Patescibacteria. In our previous study, we confirmed the presence of Gracilibacteria in activated sludge and successfully recovered its high-quality genome. In this study, we designed new probes to visualize members of Gracilibacteria in activated sludge and identified its host using FISH. The FISH observations revealed that Gracilibacteria, which formed loosely associated clusters, were located within dense clusters of Zoogloea, which were dominant in the activated sludge. The metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of Zoogloea possessed genes related to extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) biosynthesis, floc formation, and nutrient removal, including a polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) accumulation pathway. The MAGs of Gracilibacteria possessed genes associated with type IV pili, competence protein EC (ComEC), and PHA degradation, which suggests that they have a Zoogloea-dependent lifestyle in activated sludge flocs. These findings clearly indicate a new symbiotic relationship between Gracilibacteria and Zoogloea, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show this interaction.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.